In password security, the longer the better. With a password manager, using more than 24 characters is simple. Unless, of course, the secure password is not accepted due to its length. (In this case, through STOVE.)

Possibly indicating cleartext storage of a limited field (which is an absolute no-go), or suboptimal or lacking security practices.

  • Kissaki@feddit.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    The claim was that a limit on passwords implies plaintext storage.

    quoting the post:

    Possibly indicating cleartext storage of a limited field (which is an absolute no-go), or

    It was not a claim that it certainly is plaintext storage. It was claimed to be a possibility. AND provided an alternative explanation.

    Maybe you’re more confident than me in good practices and implementations across all services. But I’ve seen enough to know that’s not always the case. It’s good to be skeptical on anything related to security.

    • x00z
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      but this in no way indicates clear text password storage.

      It does.

      No it doesn’t.

      • troed@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        It does.

        /80’s hacker turned Software Engineer turned Cybersecurity professional

        • x00z
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          Lmao.

          As if my title isn’t almost exactly the same.