• A_Union_of_Kobolds
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    1 year ago

    You take that circle A off your sovcit nonsense RIGHT NOW

    Emma Goldman is turning in her grave

      • dejected_warp_core
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s like some hilarious half-baked plan at my DnD table.

        Mage: I know, I’ll use the magic item I found to attack the Lich!
        DM: The one that you found in the Lich’s crypt?
        Mage: Yes.
        DM: The one with the backstory about how the Lich made it himself?
        Mage: Uh-huh.
        DM: The one where he spent three centuries researching and crafting it to dominate the world of the living? The one that has the inscription: “For the master’s tool will never dismantle the master’s house.”
        Mage: … oh.
        DM: Yeah…
        Mage: I’m in danger.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          LOL this is the perfect analogy. Well done. XD

          “I know! I’ll dismantle the state with…their laws written by corporations and…the market…genius!”

  • Scolding7300
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    What are they trying to say with that? (Genuinely don’t understand)

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Having read ucc 1 308 and info about it I’m even more confused. Seems like they’re saying they can write “under protest” on a ticket and not have to pay? But that law isn’t about people driving. It’s about business transactions. Or maybe they’re saying the car isn’t related to business? It’s not like they’re logical though lol