asudox@programming.dev to TechnologyEnglish · 10 months agoConcerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square199linkfedilinkarrow-up1734arrow-down1105 cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]selfhosted[email protected][email protected]linuxphoronix
arrow-up1629arrow-down1external-linkConcerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comasudox@programming.dev to TechnologyEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square199linkfedilink cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]selfhosted[email protected][email protected]linuxphoronix
minus-squareschizo@forum.uncomfortable.businesslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28arrow-down1·10 months agoDon’t forget option 3: someone writes a vaultwarden client independent of the closed-source crap. If you can write a server that fully supports the client via the documented API, then you know everything you’d need to do to make a client as well.
minus-squarehumorlessrepostlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·10 months agoThat’s not a third option in the same list (things they are going to do), it’s an item in an entirely different list (foss responses to their actions).
Don’t forget option 3: someone writes a vaultwarden client independent of the closed-source crap.
If you can write a server that fully supports the client via the documented API, then you know everything you’d need to do to make a client as well.
That’s not a third option in the same list (things they are going to do), it’s an item in an entirely different list (foss responses to their actions).