• Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    “The crash caused significant damage to the aircraft”. Um, what aircraft? You mean that hole in the ground?

    Glad the pilot’s OK.

  • extremeboredom
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Isn’t the failure rate on the F 35 like WAY higher than previous fighters? Oh well, at least Lockheed got that sweet, sweet contract, right?

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It has extremely low flight time. There is also “Right to repair” issues in favour of manufacturer where they don’t provide adequate manuals to keep the aircraft operational. Decline of US is affected by military mission to spend more money to political donors rather than provide value to Armed Forces.

  • noride@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Google says that thing cost somewhere between $82MM - $109MM. I wonder how many meals it could have been instead.

    • DarkShaggy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      And meetings to discuss / review the paperwork…

  • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Isn’t that the second F35 in a few weeks? I can remember another F35 having a nose gear failure with the pilot ejecting at ground level.

  • Bieren
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s a feature of the software. Nothing to see here.

  • jqubed
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Am I missing something? I’m not seeing a video in the post or at the link

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Whilst in technically true that the plane was landing, I don’t think he was actually making a landing.

    Looked a lot more like the plane wasn’t under power at all.

    • eRac@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Landing gear were down, so it was likely coming in for a landing when the incident occurred. Based on the height and positioning, maybe an attempted go-around that ended in abandoning the craft entirely.