“If we actually touch fire, we will certainly be burned, but if we merely say the word fire without actually touching it, we won’t be burned. Likewise, if we only think of the word fire, our heads will not be set ablaze. Therefore, the definition of fire, whose nature is to burn all things, cannot itself be the reality of it.”

Kosho Uchiyama

  • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Interesting thought. Pardon my ignorance, but would this be considered a “koan”.

    • StrangeMedOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      No, this is a part where he was explaining how mind-perception works

    • ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.comM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      If I’m not mistaken koans are typically based on much older stories. This guy is 20th century. Great question though!

    • rainrain@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      He’s explaining the difference between “thinking” and “reality” with an example.

      So, not a koan but rather a forthright attempt to get a point across.