• PugJesusOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    They were paid on the way, but when their employer died, so too did their pay! On the way back, they were unpaid, and only survived by looting, extorting, and scavenging along the way.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t understand how that would work in those days, wouldn’t the employer be carrying all the money with him in the form of coins? If he dies, can’t you just take it and split it amongst yourselves?

      • PugJesusOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Much of the money wouldn’t have been ‘on-hand’. When their employer (a claimant to the Persian throne) died, so too did all of his social pull and contacts. Also, during the Battle of Cunaxa, the encampment was captured, where any of the money that was present would have plundered by the enemy.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, I read the article and it makes more sense to me now. I imagined he would be travelling with them, but that obviously wasn’t the case.

          • DrunkenPirate@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Even though it’s been thought to us in school, humankind never used money / coins in its history. It was always rather a kind of obligations and credits.

            Only at the time of the ancient empires (romans, han dynasty) coins were used strongly. But mainly for paying the army soldiers. In middle age that coin thing faded again.