… English is one of the most difficult languages to learn to read and write. Unlike Spanish or Welsh, where letters have consistent sound values, English is a patchwork of linguistic inheritances. Its roughly 44 phonemes – the distinct sounds that make up speech – can each be spelt multiple ways. The long “i” sound alone, as in “eye”, has more than 20 possible spellings. And many letter combinations contradict one another across different words: think of “through”, “though” and “thought”.

It was precisely this inconsistency that Conservative MP Sir James Pitman – grandson of Sir Isaac Pitman, the inventor of shorthand – identified as the single greatest obstacle for young readers. In a 1953 parliamentary debate, he argued that it is our “illogical and ridiculous spelling” which is the “chief handicap” that leads many children to stumble with reading, with lasting consequences for their education. His proposed solution, launched six years later, was radical: to completely reimagine the alphabet.

The result was ITA: 44 characters, each representing a distinct sound, designed to bypass the chaos of traditional English and teach children to read, and fast. Among the host of strange new letters were a backwards “z”, an “n” with a “g” inside, a backwards “t” conjoined with an “h”, a bloated “w” with an “o” in the middle. Sentences in ITA were all written in lower case.

By 1966, 140 of the 158 UK education authorities taught ITA in at least one of their schools. The new alphabet was not intended as a permanent replacement for the existing one: the aim was to teach children to read quickly, with the promise they would transition “seamlessly” into the standard alphabet by the age of seven or eight. But often, that seamless transition never quite happened.

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2025/jul/06/1960s-schools-experiment-created-new-alphabet-thousands-children-unable-to-spell

  • Melobol@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Unfortunately other countries tried similar things. Their efforts lead to way more dyslexic people. They tried to make reading and comprehension faster by teaching the “shape” of words instead of teaching reading letter by letter. (And it was a latin alphabet language.)
    It is still a struggle especially in second and third languages.

  • Valmond
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Who thinks English is hard to read or write lol?

    Edit: The hardest

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Let’s take written Spanish, which is virtually completely phonetic. You can spell almost any word you hear without ever having seen it, and you can pronounce literally any word you see without ever having heard it.

      Meanwhile, consider ghoti.

      • Valmond
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I didn’t say there were no languages easier than English! But English being the hardest language out there? You almost don’t even conjugate, in french there are over 90 version of a verb. There are a hundred variants of them. And Russian is worse IMO.

        Example of one verb (-group) in French:

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          Conjugation has nothing to do with spelling. English conjugation may be the easiest of the Indo-European languages. In Chinese it’s dead-simple.

    • kurikai
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Only language that has spelling bees. English spelling is stupid.

      • Valmond
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        They have it in France for french, what are you talking about 😋 ?

        Usually no one gets full points which is wild IMO.

    • indieterminacy@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well, Im a fan of Shaw’s reasoning about how ill fitting English is as a consequence of using the Latin alphabet.

      See his writing as a precursor to this interesting book on philology: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.462145/page/n1/mode/2up

      But using children as fodder to prove a theory is rather cruel.

      Its a pity that Shaw’s endowment for the Shavian alphabet was ruined through the other beneficiaries snatching it via the legal system.