Recording on-duty law enforcement agents is protected by the First Amendment.

  • TuffNutzes
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 month ago

    Just like running away from them and blocking their violent blows is “assaulting a federal officer”.

  • MushuChupacabra
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    1 month ago

    Identify them all.

    Publish at a time of your choosing.

    Like after the regime falls, and the nazi hunting starts.

    • halcyoncmdr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 month ago

      Data hoarders gonna be working overtime stockpiling evidence.

      • MushuChupacabra
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        I mentioned it in previous discussions, but the least stupid of the ICE bunch should be collecting dirt on their Korpsbruders.

        Might come in handy for plea bargaining 8n the future.

      • Cousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Right? This just makes me want to start stockpiling. I’m not even a data hoarder or expert tracker, I just happen to have 8TB of disk space.

  • ChokingHazard
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 month ago

    No expectation of privacy in public. And with scotus rulings no constitutional right to privacy either…

    • pivot_root
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Don’t worry, they’ll find some way to ignore their own precedent.

  • WhyDoYouPersist
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    I feel like the more small shit they penalize their citizens for, the more just doing large shit makes sense.

    • GreenKnight23
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      always give your enemy a way out, because if you don’t…bad shit happens.

  • TwinTitans
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This is not China, there are rules, and if you are not going to follow them, the people will force you to. Your identification does not get to remain hidden.

  • BradleyUffner
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I thought they themselves were embedding “reporters” within the ICE squads to film the raids for their own amusement?

  • Optional
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    Who in DHS says this? We need names, people! And home addresses! And any known allergies.

  • Ascrod@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    Surveillance state masters don’t like when surveillance is used on them. Boo fucking hoo, drink your medicine.

  • BeeegScaaawyCripple
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    you can’t “doxx” public servants. being able to identify public servants (especially ones with authority to arrest or bear extraordinary force against their fellow citizens) is kind of important. my wife is a mere teacher and you can fucking look up how much she’s paid by the district online. we don’t even get that much privacy, all because she’s a public employee. it’s the tradeoff. every public employee, it’s up there if you know where to look.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Recording on-duty law enforcement agents is protected by the First Amendment.

    *was