• njm1314
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Weird cuz that paragraph tells you there is one. I mean it tells you Natalie Dormer is a British actress. You now know who she is. I don’t understand the disconnect here. It tells you that Ferguson was the Duchess of York. You now know who she is. What’s to get here buddy? That’s how information is conveyed. If you want more information there’s more if you keep reading.

      • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        I guess I don’t understand what the article is talking about? It seems a lot of filler for “Natalie Dormer feels bad about taking rapist money” but I don’t exactly understand what the connection is because the article doesn’t make any goddamn sense…

        Why would a Duchess of York have a TV show, and why would Epstein care about it?

        • njm1314
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Brother I’m deeply worried about your reading comprehension cuz all of that’s in the article.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Right, and Wikipedia will tell you everything about that. If you didn’t know, that’s chill, but it doesn’t indicate unclear writing.