Trump is breaking from his “America First” trade agenda and feuding with some of his most loyal supporters in a fight over U.S. beef prices.

Trump has centered his economic agenda on reducing the U.S.’s reliance on cheaper foreign products and boosting domestic production of goods and food. But his plan to boost imports of Argentinian beef while urging American suppliers to lower their prices marks a sharp departure from his platform.

The dispute is threatening Trump’s long-standing support from agriculture groups and workers, who stood by the president during his first term despite the backlash they faced from his trade agenda.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      26 days ago

      Hell, switch to Impossible meat permanently.

      Fucks with MAGA farmers and drastically lowers cattle based emissions with one stone.

      • jj4211
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        26 days ago

        I think I’d rather have fruits and vegetables than impossible beef. To me it tastes worse than beef or vegetables just being their natural selves.

        I read that maybe beyond meat does it better, but haven’t bothered to try it.

        • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          25 days ago

          Impossible is much better than Beyond when comparing the ground beef replacements. I can’t speak to the rest of their lines though.

        • just_another_person
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          26 days ago

          This. Also, the production of that garbage is also horrible for the environment.

          • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            26 days ago

            Impossible beef has a lower environmental impact compared to beef, using approximately 96% less land, 87% less water, and generating 89% fewer greenhouse gas emis

            This comes from the company itself, so I don’t know how accurate it is, but I’m curious as to what makes you say it’s horrible for the environment? Raising livestock is one of the biggest environmental impactors we have.

              • BeeegScaaawyCripple
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                25 days ago

                if i reach the top of the food chain (like food, not finance or politics. via eating one of everything edible and a few things that aren’t) does that give me the environmental footprint of the entire planet?

                just wanting to know for bragging rights.

      • BanMe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        We stopped buying steaks a few years ago, hamburger went this year.

  • Sanctus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    26 days ago

    They’re just political cucks still letting Trump fuck their lives.

  • TomMasz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    26 days ago

    All that matters to him is how he can benefit. That’s it. He has no allegiance to anything or anyone other than himself.

  • blaveBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    26 days ago

    Also, with everything else he says and does and Thinks

  • Dasus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    26 days ago

    There’s some real well-off cattle owners in Argentina I see that beef at a local butchers as well.

    Probably doing beef on the side, as an excuse for all the shipping routes.