• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    That would probably be best once Trump realises he can sabotage the whole trial with the use of his camera phone.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Honestly, no. I don’t think he can use one other than for tweeting nonsense. And the bird icon is gone now, so he can’t even do that.

    • zebs
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Couldn’t members of the public do the same?

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        If they’re allowed in, then I assume so.

        But they might actually face repercussions for doing so, while Trump feels little people laws are beneath him, and in fairness here, I’ve not seen a lot in the last 6 years or so that might prove him wrong on that.

        Rich people rarely face consequences. Epstein ran a literal paedo island for 20 years, and it was (probably) only the blackmailing of even richer people that landed him in prison and “suicided”.

        Even with all these charges, I reckon the best we can hope for is Trump not being allowed to run the country again, and even then I suspect time and poor shape may take care of that so a judge doesn’t have to.

      • Viking_Hippie
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yes, but most of them don’t have “rich and powerful white guy” near-total immunity from the “justice” system, so they wouldn’t get away with jury tampering like their Mango Messiah has so far.