What an utter piece of shit.

    • deadtom
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      155
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Not anymore. They gave them to Russia under guarantees they wouldt do… pretty much everything they are doing right now.

      I’m starting to think Russia might not be trustworthy…

      • jj4211
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, in the mid 90s the world was so optimistic about Russia, and frankly reassured about the nukes going to Russia, which was believed to be the more confidently governed nation state.

        Everyone was still riding high on the cold war seemingly coming to a close.

      • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        88
        ·
        2 years ago

        Too bad so sad! Should have been smart like Kim Jong. Keep some nukes and you don’t get invaded.

          • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            45
            ·
            2 years ago

            No, I’m pretty sure they haven’t stopped anybody from disarming. But I think everyone should have nukes anyway.

        • Buddahriffic
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          You make a good point. Ukraine should build some of their own nukes.

          • kava
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            US would never allow this. Ukraine is only useful if it can function as a buffer state for a proxy war.

          • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            60
            ·
            2 years ago

            They would have to figure out how to do it and they aren’t smart enough, better if they ask Russia to lend them some in exchange for surrendering all disputed territories.

        • MataVatnik
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          2 years ago

          You’re trolling but I unironically agree

      • kava
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I think he addressed it clearly enough. Russia invading Ukraine has no risk of Ukraine starting a nuclear war. Why? Because Ukraine does not have nukes.

        A country like Russia, if facing an existential threat, has the capacity and incentive to use nuclear weapons. Why? Because they have nukes.

        This is why even the US had hesitations last year (same time this Starlink episode happened) about sending certain types of weapons to Ukraine - out of fear of nuclear escalation. Now that Ukraine has drone striked Russian territory a few times it seems obvious because nuclear escalation hasn’t happened… but Musk was not alone in thinking this. Remember that US refused to give all sorts of weaponry at first. They didn’t want to give fighters jets, tanks, etc.