• rah@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Boring is good. I don’t want to be surprised by the software I use.

    • rho50@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Zsh is a nice balance of modern features and backwards compatibility with bash.

      • AnarchistArtificer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        The first time I used zsh, I was an overenthusiastic Linux noob and got too customisation happy, and I clogged it up. I used bash for a while to ground myself. It’s good to have experience with the thing that’s standard.

  • Treczoks@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    The article just describes the how, but gives no reasons for a why.

    So, why would anyone move away from the de-facto standard bash, except for some rare circumstances like having a small system and using busybox?

      • TheGrandNagus
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, and I suspect most reading the article haven’t either, so the above guy’s question stands - what’s wrong with Bash in comparison to the others?

        • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          I don’t use anything other than BASH, but I hear that ZSH has command tab-completion (not just directory tab-autocomplete) similar to PowerShell and also some other cool shit I’m not really bothered to check out since bash is the GOAT.

        • Kogasa@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Nothing wrong with it, it’s just boring. Fish shell has some new features that make it nice to use. So does zsh. Tab completions, history navigation, plugins and such.

        • null@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Why does something have to be wrong with Bash for Fish to be better?

          • TheGrandNagus
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            I asked why others are better, I never called Bash shit.

            It stands to reason that if people want to switch to something else, then they must have advantages over Bash.

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              what’s wrong with Bash in comparison to the others?

              The others have plenty of QoL features like auto-complete, spelling correction, syntax highlighting, etc.

              Doesn’t mean there’s anything “wrong” with Bash by comparison.

    • MimicJar
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      I agree that the article lacks the why, but choice is a huge part of Linux. Why Debian and not Fedora? Why KDE and not GNOME? Why Vim and not Emacs?

      Each provides something similar, but each is different.

      Bash is a great default. I like Bash. However I think ZSH provides better tab completion. The fish shell provides command highlighting.

      It’s worth trying others to see what works for you.

    • trevor (he/they)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Fish is actually user friendly and easy to learn. The interactive completions are better than any other shell and are something I don’t want to live without.

      It differs from bash in some esoteric ways, but any issues you might encounter as a result are easily worked around by putting shebangs in your scrips, which you should be doing anyway, and bash -c 'your command'.

      Honorable mention for nushell, but that one differs from bash a little too much to pick up quickly. However, having an object-oriented shell is pretty sick.

    • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Because you’re bored. It says so right in the title.

      Personally I don’t see the point of changing the shell either. Bash is more than good enough for my use and any other shell is going to have the disadvantage of not being the ubiquitous standard so it is always going to have an uphill battle to dislodge bash.

      That said, if people want to play around with a new shell just for the sake of it, why not? I like to play around with exotic window managers myself, not because my regular plasma desktop doesn’t suffice, but because I like to try something different every now and then.

    • cholesterol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s in the title: ‘Boredom’.

      It’s just for the of trying something new, which describes a lot of Linux users.

    • GustavoM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      To learn something new. Which can be boring and frustrating (depending of how “new” the thing is) but it will be (always) fun in the end.

      Why? Because you learned something new.

      “Oh, but learning new things is boring!”

      Then it’s time to (re)evaluate your life choices.

      • Treczoks@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Why? Because you learned something new.

        Well, at the moment I have to learn new things on every front, so adding “learning a new shell” is not high on my priority list.

  • BudgieMania@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Bored with driving your car with a wheel and pedals? Change the default handling device in your vehicle

    • extant
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      How do I put it into mech mode?

      • BudgieMania@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        That sounds like a way more transformative change than simply changing the handling device sir, motivated by an urge to look cool to outsiders over any practicality

        you want to go from linux to mac basically

        • extant
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          It just needs some minor compatibility upgrades like a nuclear reactor and a sword or something. You can probably find that at your nearest Walmart at any time in the year 3000 onwards.

        • WalrusByte
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Not too deep underwater. Unrelated question: how deep is the Titanic wreckage?

    • ffhein
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      It looks pretty, but IMO one of the selling points of zsh is that it allows async updating of the prompt, allowing you to use slow commands like “git status” without adding a delay every time the prompt needs to be printed.

      E.g. the default prompt from prezto is quite light and responsive, but when inside a git repo adds the info on the right side (shows when you have commits ahead/behind the remote branch, stashes, modified/deleted/added/staged files, etc) when that becomes available.

      Image

      Didn’t look like any of the example themes on ohmyposh.dev had the $RPROMPT stuff, which I guess would be difficult support for a cross-shell theming engine.

  • Dr_Willis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    tip: don’t install fish or whatever, change your default shell, THEN uninstall fish because you don’t like it.

    Change your default shell back first.

    I have seen way too many support posts where people paint their self I to a corner doing that.

    or just don’t change the default shell.

    run fish as needed, then exit back to bash when done.

    I have

    • Semperverus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Add it to your .bashrc so it autolaunches, but fails back to bash.

  • juli@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Nice. But I want to change the default terminal in gnome but gnome-files doesn’t respect my choice. …

    • TheGrandNagus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I don’t see the clickbait. The title references how to change the shell, the article then shows exactly that. I don’t feel baited.

      I think you’re using clickbait as a meaningless buzzword for something you don’t like, rather than its actual meaning.

      • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Perhaps not literally clickbait, but you have to admit it’s a fairly low effort article. It’s several pages of fluff to say that you can run chsh to change your shell.

        • TheGrandNagus
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Well in that case I’m sorry everybody isn’t as bland and grumpy as you.