• 58 Posts
  • 9.09K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 9th, 2023

help-circle

  • Swapping gas stove for induction. It was a bit delayed because they screwed up capping the gas line, so new install on new circuit. I plugged it in and nothing happened.

    It could be as simple as the breaker is off or there’s some sort of power button on the new stove. I got as far as plugging it in and nothing lit up, then already ran out of time. If it’s something that simple, we get to the beer sooner



  • wtf from the cops

    a homicide detective with the Houston Police Department, told KHOU, noting the boy’s death does not appear to involve self-defense because the shooting “wasn’t close to the house.”

    Implying that if they rang the doorbell and waited (you know, the entire purpose of a doorbell), it could have been considered self-defense? I know, that’s a bit of logical fallacy but wtf






  • AA5BtoHome ImprovementOdd wiring in a 2-gang
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That option 2 wiring would be wrong for a dumb switch, so they’re relying on smartswitch behavior. I didn’t read too far into it but

    • they specify only certain models for the virtual switch. Are you using one of those?
    • those switches can also pair directly with smart bulbs: was the old fixture using those?
    • the writing diagram assumes three colored wires on the traveler (black, white, red) however older wiring commonly used only two. Can you verify you have three? With older two wire setup, the neutral was repurposed to traveller, making it easier to screw up
    • could you have lost some configuration on the switches when the power was disconnected?



  • Legally passenger rail has the right of way, but reality can turn that around.

    • freight isn’t always scheduled, but “when full”, so it’s tough to coordinate
    • freight can be slow so owners have no incentive to keep the track in good condition, slowing everyone
    • freight is infrequent so no need to parallel rails: many places have only maintained one track, so how can a faster train pass?
    • freight trains have gotten longer, outgrowing many sidings, so there are fewer places they can pull over to let faster trains pass

    Each of these is quite legal, and even normal to some extent, but adds up to huge delays and unpredictable schedules for passenger rail

    NOTE: this is also one cause for our unacceptable levels of accidents. As freight trains get slower and longer they block at grade intersections for unacceptable lengths of time. As they’ve gotten longer without updating sidings and rail yards to match, there are too many cases of trains stopped blocking at grade intersections. Too many drivers frustrated by too many delays tempts some to cross the tracks when it’s not safe, with predictable results.


  • As long as certain people expect Amtrak to be profitable, and we’re not willing to invest in fixing a century of deferred maintenance, how can we possible dig out of this hole?

    My hope is in state supported routes, although they’re too limited won’t be fast or comprehensive. For example New Hampshire is not a place you’d find enough people to build profitable high speed rail. However they own control some existing track given up by freight rail. In particular I understand there’s a track to Manchester that connects to a track in use by MBTA commuter rail, and they’re considering rail service between Boston and the capital, including the airport. I don’t know if it will happen, but it would only be because of the state.

    A lot of investments from the infrastructure act were to study state supported routes and how to add them to the Amtrak network. This is a big deal, because rail is so much more useful when added to a network. We’re stuck at the beginning where each project is considered for only its own merits, and need to build to the point where they can also be considered for the overall network






  • I’m definitely capitalist in that I think private wownership of the means of production usually works out best but there are many variations and we seem to pick the worst.

    One of the fundamental purposes of government is to establish a market. Establish a foundation of legal and contractual processes, a currency, some level of transparency and fairness. We mostly have those, although the transparency and fairness has been heavily eroded.

    But government is established “by the people, for the people”. Its governments role to configure that marketplace to serve the people, the society. Capitalism will always exploit negative externalities, imbalances of power, lack of transparency, but its governments role to structure those to not harm people or society, and we’re failing at that. Modern capitalism is structured for very short term profit-seeking even at the expense of the long term, but its governments role to consider that and structure the market to serve longer term goals. Some services for society are NOT handled well bely capitalism: that’s where government needs to step in more. It’s government that is failing , government captured by the oligarchs, government corrupted for profit and power seeking, government that’s lost its way. And by government I obviously mean those in charge, those who make the decisions, not those who get things done.

    I found this article classifying types of capitalism and apparently its “ State-guided Capitalism”, but my preference gets fascinating from there - it classifies China as an extreme example whereas we tend to call it communism or socialism or something

    1. State-guided Capitalism …

    In many countries, critical infrastructure, such as airlines or railways, are operated by companies in which the state owns all or most of the stock. These may also simply be directly controlled government entities in which case they function more like the police or fire service. …

    State-guided capitalism is different to socialism…. …

    Examples of countries which have state-guided capitalism are everywhere. In fact, it could be argued that all countries are to some extent examples of it, as the modern economy always requires some form of regulation. Without such rules as health or safety regulations, societies end up with far more problems than without. …

    China – A great example of a heavily interventionist state is China. The Chinese government owns firms that together account for 40% of the economy,