• 32 Posts
  • 2.62K Comments
Joined 3 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月10日

help-circle


  • The US has a population density of 37 people per square kilometer, the EU is 106, which is three times higher. China is 147 people per square kilometer.

    By distance, those European rail networks are also tiny compared to what’s needed in the US.

    A rail line from Seattle-Portland-San Francisco-Los Angeles alone would be longer than the entire highspeed rail system in Germany, and only connect 21 million people across those metro areas, half of which are in LA.

    The German network covers around 60 million people in the Metro areas it covers.

    LA to New York by rail is the same distance as the entirety of Spain’s rail system, and would have an even shittier coverage ratio. Not to mention even a direct trip would still take 14-16 HOURS, where a flight takes 6ish + a couple at the airport waiting for less than $100 return on a budget airline. Why the fuck would anyone take the train? Even if the train was free, it wouldn’t be worth it for anyone conducting business between those two places.

    When distances get large, high-speed rail gets crushed by airplanes. The infrastructure for high speed rail is just too fucking expensive unless you’re moving absolutely massive numbers of people around.



  • A proper Land value tax is a way of preventing owners from making any money off the appreciation of the value of land while still being profitable to construct or renovate if it adds value. It significantly reduces if not outright eliminates housing as an investment.

    Land value taxes only apply to the value of the land itself, not the buildings, and therefore desirable areas with high land value taxes have a significant incentive to sell and be redeveloped with density which spread a that tax among a larger number of tenants.

    The biggest downside is that it completely destroys existing equity. Which is both how it makes everything affordable again, and is also likely why it won’t pass as a policy for many years.


  • Currency isn’t the problem, and you really need to keep that concept separate from the issues that happen within Capitalism.

    Currency is just a convenient method to measure and exchange resources.

    Very few people desire an allocated home and weekly rations of flour, chicken, and butter. If you instead give them a list of things they can choose from, and assign ratios and a limit for total resources, all you’ve done is create a new currency.





  • Unintended consequences, or just ones you aren’t aware of?

    There’s lots of known things that will happen, both good and bad.

    • A significant de-urbanization would be likely, similar to what we saw with remote work during COVID
    • There would be a drop in certain types of crime
    • A small chunk of the population would become absolute shut-ins, and likely become very mentally unwell
    • Divorce would probably go up
    • The birth rate would likely also go up






  • You’re pulling shit out of your ass at this point, there are some doom reports out of people suggesting that may be a problem, but there are also reports out of other companies(meta for example) with documentation saying the rate is much lower and the mean failure is 6+ years.

    The other leftovers from the crash also won’t have that problem. It’s not just about GPUs. Datacenters and their infrastructure last a lot longer, and the electric generation/transportation networks will also potentially be useful for various alternative applications if the AI use case flops.