

Is only terrorism if the group is advocating for ethical treatment of people. If the group supports or does incredibly unethical stuff then it isn’t terrorism by definition.
I wish this timeline wasn’t ones of the dumbest ones.


Is only terrorism if the group is advocating for ethical treatment of people. If the group supports or does incredibly unethical stuff then it isn’t terrorism by definition.
I wish this timeline wasn’t ones of the dumbest ones.
Fuck yeah!
Fuck censorship!


Because for it to exist someone has to purchase the equipment, set it up, pay the bill for the electricity it uses, and take the time to maintain it.
It would be great if we could simply wish something existed and it would exist. If you feel strongly about it, put in the work to make the world you want to see!


Money, labor, lack of a current real need, and in some cases laws.


Well it started with the initial abolisment of the Fairness doctrine by the FCC in '87.
While the fairness doctrine was not perfect, removing it and not replacing it with anything allowed the news in the US to become the billionaire funded captured propaganda machines that they are today.


This might be one of the dumbest headlines I have read in a while and unfortunately we live in a timeline with no lack off dumb headlines


Well, sometimes you can’t post about what you do so that you can keep doing it.


Financial domination


I’m sure the trump admin will be very helpful…


Motion activated sprinkler. Works if it’s human or animal, something like The first result on Amazon, just an example not an endorsement off the particular product


The media had been complicit for a long long time


C-suite execs


Probably pretty great, what incentive does he have to be on the right side?


I’d they are letting you take money out of your account by only giving your name, you need to get a new bank. They need to be verifying your identity somehow.

Thanks for the joke dad.


The official, who was not named, added that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and U.S. President Donald Trump would discuss the “most sensitive issues” of the framework.
Unnamed US official who only talked to ABC news.
The feels a lot like bullshit. I wouldn’t be surprised if the must sensitive issues turn out to be the location of the border.


Patriotism is a hell of a drug.


You can light C4 on fire and hit it with a hammer as it burns and it still will not detonate
Well at least we know he is definitely not a Russian asset