Despite all his bloviating about militarizing Washington DC being anti crime. He repeatedly shows himself up to be quite the opposite. Rhetoric is cheap actions are where the rubber meets road.

I don’t mean to invoke phrenology but the little girl on the right isn’t doing the right any favours.

Even if the US is belatedly on the right path, and “if” is doing some pretty big lifting hear. Without some honest and deep introspection and recognition that they fucked up, these latecomers will fall for the same old shit again and again. Just can’t trust 'em, bro.

Took me a while to clock it. For those in a similar position the stabbed person didn’t magically get resurrected, like I first thought.

While that may be an explanation. It’s no excuse.

And the politicians that are hoping to sell out.

If you are in the UK and thumbing up this post, is that considered a terrorist action. Be careful out there…

Is it really a human right if it’s not exercised? Are any rights, for that matter. If a right is negotiated, does that mean that it more an option?

Yeah, without the grid scale energy storage, this is little more than green washing. I think we should utilise the UK portfolio of wind turbines as close as 100% as possible before building any more.

All this pear clutching performative outrage is just a distraction from the crimes against humanity perpetrated by the current Israeli government. Making the messenger the story.

While I think your comment is perfectly valid and I do agree with it. I also think maybe you’re looking too deeply into what is essentially a pity bon mot.

It’s OK, he doesn’t need her endorsement anyway, just the electorate’s. At this stage I think an establishment democrat endorsement will do more harm to Mamdani’s campaign than this shun will do.

Bad? From what perspective? I’ve been using it no problem. Sure, it can get delusional (what LLM doesn’t?). But it’s useful to get the general gist of something.

Is that your policy? Sorry bub, even abstaining is a political stance.

Sorry, by “it” I meant the cartoon. I don’t see much fascism on display in the image. The whole obey thing and Unitary executive theory where Trump controls everything is by definition authoritarian. With flecks of totalitarianism when it comes to thr handling of immigrants. Non of this prevents his administration also being fascist.

It’s not really fascism, more authoritarianism/totalitarianism.

What a petty diva Musk is. FFS, every jab Musk tries to land on Trump circles 'round to him. As he, himself stated he got Trump elected despite credible accusations that Trump palled around with and knew about Epstein’s PDFilia.

Most of the legal issues raised in this piece assumes that the executive cares for such trifles. To sum it up concisely: “I’m the President, bitch and I can do WTF I want. Don’t like it? Come at me.”

Unlikely that this will happen but if we are playing a game of escalation perhaps he could deputise people with access to millenary equipment. Remember, the armed forces pledge allegiance to the constitution and nobody else. They also have the duty to not follow an illegal order.

Don’t you fear that it’ll be seen as escalatory?