Fuck Nestle, Kit Kats are made by Nestle.

Captured, then released. From the article:

Otherwise, she seemed to be in good condition and, as I released her, she sauntered away into the darkness, seemingly unfazed by her close encounter with me.

You really should be providing a source when you make these kinds of claims:

Joel Myers’ Wikipedia article is pretty damning. He does sound like an asshole.

Myers faced criticism in 2005 when he supported the National Weather Service Duties Act of 2005, a bill … that would have prohibited the National Weather Service from publishing weather data to the public when private-sector entities, such as AccuWeather, perform the same function commercially.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joel_Myers#Political_activities

Fruit, vegetables, whole grains, exercise, some sunlight, some socialisation, an easy creative hobby.

You’re right, it is easier to list those things.

Not according to latest studies, there is no safe level of processed meat consumption.

Cold cuts are often processed, rather than delivered raw.

Secondary News Article: https://www.sciencealert.com/massive-review-finds-no-safe-level-of-processed-meat-consumption

Original Study: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-025-03775-8

consuming processed meat (at 0.6–57 g d−1) was associated with at least an 11% average increase in type 2 diabetes risk and a 7% (at 0.78–55 g d−1) increase in colorectal cancer risk.

So eating a gram of processed meat per day would significantly increase chances of type 2 diabetes, and colorectal cancer.

1 gram ≃ 0.03 ounces (British imperial units)

Link to study: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.06576

Conversely, they welcomed automation that would free up time for higher-value work (69.4%), reduce task repetitiveness (46.6%), and improve the quality of their work (46.6%). Specifically, they welcomed automation that might include scheduling client appointments, maintaining files of information, or rectifying errors in records.

The study also explored preferences regarding the level of AI involvement. Most respondents favored a collaborative approach, with 45.2% desiring an equal partnership between workers and AI and 35.6% seeking human oversight at critical junctures. This indicates a clear resistance to fully automated systems, the scholars noted.

“Some of those that work forces are the same that burn crosses.”

The Mad Lib type of writing.

“Today I learned that [enter service of company], they [enter bonus service/ product offered].”

It walks, swims and quacks like an ad.

Not sure why you’re being downvoted, this is clearly an ad.

This is the same logic as “The big red sticker says I’m saving money if I buy this thing.”

Want to actually save money? Don’t spend it at all.

Also, if you think Prime day somehow hurts their bottom line, you’re misinformed.

Some moron will give you an extra point on your interview

Why would I want to work for a moron?

“I’m going to use a model trained on incorrect data, to correct the data, and then train on that data.”

27% of 8 hours is approximately 2 hours and 10 minutes. That’s about right.

For those OOTL (like I was):

https://time.com/7285796/james-comey-86-47-trump-threat-investigation-instagram-post-fbi/

Let me sell you a Trump steak.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_Steaks

Maybe they didn’t know.

“Maybe they weren’t aware of their surroundings while driving a vehicle.”

The vast majority of coding isn’t making something new, it’s using existing patterns and tools and arranging them to fit a specific use case.

I would argue that arranging something to fit a specific use case is making something new.

Ask any designer how difficult it is to get a spec sheet from a client and meet their expectations. We’re expecting LLMs to suddenly solve this problem.

Llms may not be able to create a new framework or design pattern

Until they can do this, there is little threat to designers. There will be less grunt work, of course.

The sad reality is that code is just a form of language, and LLMs are good at learning languages.

This is debatable. LLMs are prediction machines.

What use is prediction when you are trying to code something new?

Only for a few, and only those who have a gift for it, which Paul claims he had.

and a bible that says not to have too much sex

I’m not sure what Bible you’ve read. The ones I’ve read make no claim to “not have too much sex”.