
How privacy respecting can it be when you have to jump through hoops to turn off everything it shouldn’t do by default, in the name of privacy in the first place?

How privacy respecting can it be when you have to jump through hoops to turn off everything it shouldn’t do by default, in the name of privacy in the first place?
That should be my line.
Lurking is so much easier though!


They are releasing digital as well.


deleted by creator


A choice allows for saying no. Installing it anyway takes away your choice. Having to disable something you didn’t want to begin with puts the responsibility on the person that didn’t want it. Then you are responsible for keeping up with it hoping it doesn’t turn itself on in an update or send information somewhere regardless of being disabled.
A separate update/download for AI would actually give the user a choice.


AI should be built like the internet — open, accessible, and driven by choice
If they really wanted to give you a choice, they would allow the option of saying no, don’t install any of it.


Let’s do one better and get rid of all the surveillance.


Good crew!


Ublock lite is very lite compared to the original. Even using every filter option it still misses quite a bit. I’ll stick with Firefox.


Technically true


Google can’t keep malware off the platform now, but sure, make it mandatory you can’t go anywhere else unless they say so first.


It’s complicated.
That’s my line!
Settings>General>Posts>Autoplay Gifs/Video
I usually tell people I have better ways of doing actual work that doesn’t require me to hand over every facet of my life.
Switzerland has a surveillance law in the works that will force VPNs, messaging apps, and online platforms to log users’ identities, IP addresses, and metadata for government access


Or is it the fat just walking away? anyone remember the Adipose

deleted by creator
This just emphasizes another reason why people should not consider it a privacy respecting browser. :)