I wouldn’t really trust Ed Zitron’s math analysis when he gets a very simple thing like “there is no real AI adoption” plainly wrong

Except he doesn’t say that. the author of this article simply made that up.

There is a high usage rate (almost entirely ChatGPT btw, despite all the money sunk into AI by others like Google) but its all the free stuff and they are losing bucketloads of money at a rate that is rapidly accelerating.

but most tech startups run at a loss for a long time before they either turn a profit or get acquired.

There is no path to profitability.

Because of low winter rainfall.

The lack of dilution increases the levels in dams.

These surveys are garbage.

Why would you apply for retail with a degree ? It will become worthless in a couple of years.

…yeah, but they only employ women for those jobs.

You mean opaque.

And you will definitely find out about libraries if you attempt to install anything.

Some packages will install in your home directory, others, for no apparent reason will spread themselves around the system in the area only available in administration mode. Good luck finding where it all went. The only way I can find is to look at the path in Synaptic, most package managers won’t record it.

This particular model was advertised as being able to use tools, like calculators. And it includes a calculator tool in the package.

So, it should in theory, not have the probabilistic limitations of its native algorithms.

However, there are still the limitations created by multiple posts, where the model will change its answer in relation to previous inputs by users. This may have become even worse in model 5 because it supposedly remembers pervious conversations.

No they didn’t.

Well not really. Beef production is not a significant industry in Texas, and its generally known more for sheep than cattle.

But beef is “manly” and so fuckwit dumb failed lawyers, who would squeal at the sight of a shovel, boast about supporting it.

Because it doesn’t prevent piracy. Are you dense ?

Yes, but the legislation specifically rules out that technology. The purpose is to remove anonymity.

The purpose is to protect the mainstream media.

Australians will soon be subjected to mandatory age checks across the internet landscape, in what has been described as a huge and unprecedented change.

Search engines are next in line for the same controversial age-assurance technology behind the teen social media ban, and other parts of the internet are likely to follow suit.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-11/age-verification-search-engines/105516256

The Japanese central bank has over a trillion dollars of US Bonds.

They will have to sell some of those bonds to cover an interest payment due this year, which is likely to cause a run on Bond rates because this is the first time they have done so.

The only alternative is to issue more Japanese bonds to cover the interest, however this is not really practical since it would cause already high interest rates to balloon in Japan. Reducing govt spending or increased taxation would cover part of the interest but the drop in tax revenue over the medium term would worsen the debt levels.

The trade agreement that Trump announced, has not, contrary to the reporting of US media, been approved by the Japanese Diet and highly unlikely to be approved, since Trump demanded Japan actually buy even more US Bonds with the non-existent money they have.

deleted by creator

Like the Apple II then ?

You know AI was invented by Apple.

Its not its called “Benzino”, which is like the latin equivalent of calling gas “gasoline”.

There is no price increase :

https://www.target.com/c/nintendo-switch-video-games/-/N-4hny0

So there’s nothing we can do.

The average age of a groom in Britain in the 19th century was 27.

Men were generally unable to marry until they had obtained property.

And the average age was higher than the 20th century as well, because of the high infant mortality rate, it wasn’t a “society of young people” at all.