• 0 Posts
  • 529 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 22nd, 2023

help-circle


  • My personal scores have increased by about 100 points in the last 6 months (I started getting worried about interest rates getting even worse and consolidated my credit cards under a personal loan with a definite payoff date).

    At this point I really don’t care what my credit score is, but this feels like a bad time to have debt, and for once in my life I feel lucky that I’m able to be paying off debt faster than I can take on more - which really hasn’t been the case since I went to university in 2007 (and never finished for financial reasons).


  • With as much as I’m ready for the AI bubble to burst, Sabine Hossenfelder isn’t a very reliable source on much of anything - especially her newer videos from within the past year after she got called out for some unscientific takes on transgender care. Since then, she has kinda doubled down on her anti-science-establishment takes acting like she knows more than actual experts.

    I’m not really criticizing any of her takes in this particular video (I’ll be honest I’m at work and haven’t had a chance to watch it yet), but just want to caution anyone who may watch this and start getting her videos recommended a bunch by their YouTube algorithm that she’s not considered a reliable science communicator by anyone who is.





  • I think the real reason they were hired was to give them something to do other than ask for the Epstein files all day on their podcasts. Kash Patel and Dan Bongino were both very outspoken about wanting the Epstein files released before they were given jobs leading the FBI. Honestly letting themselves show their incompetence to the world with this case may have been part of the plan all along. Make them look like the fools they are, and people will stop believing them when they inevitably decide they want to talk about Epstein again.


  • I agree, this doesn’t look like a deepfake. There does appear to be a quick crossfade that also explains the shifting leaves outside the window, there’s some motion blur around the time of the edit that contributes to the confusion. Admittedly, I haven’t had the time to give it a full analysis, but the rest of the video looks fine to my eyes as a film school dropout. I’m only a very part-time mod of this community so I hesitate to take down the post on my own. But if another mod wants to, I’d agree this isn’t clearly a deepfake, and probably doesn’t belong.






  • The US founding fathers decided that the president has to be at least 35, which to me implies that those individuals have had some political experience before becoming president. IMO roughly half the Senate should be under 35, and a good chunk of the House of Representatives should be under 29 considering Senate terms are 6-years long.

    Not that you should have to be a “career politician” before becoming president, but it’s fairly common to want to show some experience at leadership/politics.

    I’m not really a fan, but look at “Mayor” Pete Buttigeg. One of the biggest attacks against him when he ran was “being president is not the same as being a mayor” (meanwhile we’ll elect CEOs like their experience means anything, but that’s a whole other problem).



  • Most of us that are younger than the Boomers or maybe Gen X don’t want to count on Social Security because we’ve been hearing our whole lives that Social Security is on the chopping block because the government is in so much debt. And at this point we kinda just expect that ladder to be pulled up behind the Boomers before we get anything, because that’s already happened in so many other areas like home ownership.

    I also think people need to remember that Social Security is their own money that they paid in over their lives, and they are owed it back.

    And also that even though the US government has a large amount of debt, we’ve also spent the last 50 years giving tax cuts to the rich, we’d probably be just fine if we went back to a 90% marginal tax rate on the top earners like we had in the “good old days” of the 1950s.


  • Because both matter. It’s a spectrum, and trans rights are just one part of that spectrum: people who feel/identify entirely as though they were born in the wrong body and want to fix that. That is as much their right as those of us who may want to dress and how we like. But there are small-minded people who see that as wrong.

    People who have a problem with trans people, will eventually come for those of us who don’t dress or act to fit their stereotype of what our gender should be. They just think it’s easier to scare people about that kind of body modification when we all make choices about hair length, fingernails, piercings, tattoos, etc.

    Trans rights are the same rights as my right to paint my fingernails and have long hair as a man. It’s all just bodily autonomy, and there are people like my mother who see both as bad/against God. Give a bigot an inch, and they’ll take a mile.


  • Grew up in the great plains/midwest around the dairy industry. Had extended family who owned a smaller dairy farm. This all sounds pretty standard. Not saying it’s right, but none of it sounds new to me.

    I would imagine there were plenty of people who bought modern marketing that was designed to cruelty-wash the dairy industry. The reality is there’s no way to insert yourself between an udder and a calf without cruelty, and that’s the only way to get cow’s milk. Unless we can figure out how to get milk from lab-grown organs, which probably comes with it’s own ethical issues.


  • The AI Apocalypse won’t be from AI gaining sentience, or becoming “god-like.” It will be evil billionaires and fools using a “Chinese Room” to gain power and control for themselves while using “AI” as a scapegoat for their cruelty.

    It’s a lie to call what we have today “Artificial Intelligence” and we’re about as far from real artificial intelligence as we were 50 years ago. Anyone who tells you otherwise is selling something or wants to get you to submit to their authority by putting on a new, “high tech” face.

    Not to go all Andrew Ryan from Bioshock (he was a deeply flawed character, and I’ll admit I’m adding a bit of my own meaning to his quote), but “No gods, no kings, only man” comes to mind. Any time someone tells you there’s a higher power with all the answers, beneath it all, it’s always just a man who wants power.



Moderates