• 8 Posts
  • 723 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: September 2nd, 2023

help-circle

  • They were going downhill towards that bridge. Once they reached the lowest point (the bridge), they would naturally start slowing down and the boat would be pushing into the car, making the connection point want to go in a perpendicular direction from where the vehicles are going + at the same time the wobble gets worse because of the deceleration.

    If they had been descending slower in a controlled manner, then they would have had enough power margin at the bottom to accelerate out of the pickle, but instead it seems like they sped downhill at max power, so they had no margin left. The vehicle was probably more than adequate for the job, but speeding down hill is usually not part of the job description of towing.



  • It’s real. From the yahoo news article that someone else linked: The defense secretary wrote “Cool story, General” in response to a tweet from retired Lt. Gen. Ben Hodges about Adolf Hitler gathering Nazi generals in 1935 and them being “required to swear a personal oath to the Führer.”





  • I remember a news report from during the Yugoslav wars about a Yugoslav doctor who was attending medical university in Belgium. The Belgian professor said that they were basically teaching together, because he had nothing to teach to the refugee doctor. They were advocating for recognizing foreign diplomas and those of the Yugoslav refugees in particular.

    Nowadays we do have established procedures to recognize (at same or lower level) foreign diplomas of other countries, but I suspect that was only because the Bologna accords forced us to have procedures.



  • There’s a lot of stupid generalizations there: SK is an american enclave, “their” lives evolve around … And the other nutter who was saying that “their wives” put on make up to look white. It’s stupid generalizations and profound prejudice, but it’s not overt racism (I think). On that slippery slope scale I posted earlier of: generalization > stereotype > prejudice > overt racism, they are at the stage of prejudice. So it’s not overt racism, but it shows a racist mindset (Imo).




  • The stink of axe deodorant is really unmistakable, I don’t get how people can stand it either. And it doesn’t even do away with bad body smell, I just get to smell the body smell + the stink of axe on top. Other fragrances are less offensive though, but axe marketing works I guess.

    The smelliest people I’ve known, where there had to be an intervention at school/work, smelled badly because of their clothes / home environment, not because they didn’t wash enough. More clothes changes and storing their clean clothes in a safe space worked every time.


  • At the time when I became inactive on Reddit, Azerbaijan was building up to finish the Nagarno Karrabach conflict once and for all. There was a lot of blatant anti Armenian, pro Azerbaijani misinformation being posted in relevant discussions (that they were tolerant, only wanting peace, there was never any ethnic cleansing, …), and most of those comments went without anyone posting a simple fact check to debunk it.

    I suspected that they had been sharing a blocklist and had blocked most of those who would call them out on their bullshit. I didn’t bother either since I just expected to be blocked as well and I had basically given up on the platform anyhow. I found swapping accounts to read threads annoying as hell, so it was easier to not comment and just be silently disappointed in humanity.

    The fact checks that I did see at the time, were mostly posted as a reply to the top comment of the chain, hoping to go unnoticed by the one spreading misinformation, but that will only work for so long. Reddit is fucked when it comes to discussing political news or gauging public opinion (imo), it’s now designed for spreading misinformation (imo again).







  • Nationalism? You’re really stretching there. I don’t really get how that comes into here either. More ad hominem arguments, this time against me, won’t convince me either.

    Ultimately it’s really simple to convince me. There is data. You want this data to not be true and you want to convince me that this data is not true. To convince me that this data is not true, your options are:
    A) showing that the institution has on other occasions fabricated data. B) or showing that that report has been shown to contain fabricated data or used a flawed methodology.

    You can do neither. All your arguments against it are purely ad hominem, against aspi, against the entirety of Australia, against the evil west with their freedom of expression, with also some whataboutism about Israel thrown in. But you have no actual arguments or any kind of proof whatsoever that that data is not real. You may not want it to be real, but it apparently is. Your unwillingness to accept facts that do not align with your beliefs is a you problem.