It seems like the word is eponym and eponymous is the adjective derived from eponym. So from that I think “eponymous noun” and “epynom” would thus mean the same thing.
“An eponym is a noun after which or for which someone or something is named. Adjectives derived from the word eponym include eponymous and eponymic.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eponym
If there is visible mold on a part of a surface, then it’s reasonable to assume that a much larger part of that surface already has mold, it’s just not visible yet. Bread is basically a sponge, the surface of a sponge is the entire sponge, so that mold can have spread everywhere in the bread.
I found this overview which looks right to me: https://www.eatingwell.com/article/91553/4-moldy-foods-you-can-eat-plus-which-foods-to-toss/
Should you be dead from eating mold? I suspect that it’s a lottery with many factors: which types of molds that you have eaten, the quantities, your immune system, … But keep at it and eventually you might win a price.
I think that you didn’t read the article before chosing to back Cruz.
Except that bloat is not what the republicans are targeting. From the article:
“However, it isn’t the infotainment bloatware, wireless key-fobs, power seats, or over-the-air subscription services they’re blasting, but safety systems that the NHTSA says have saved 860,000 lives since 1968.”
As if USA republicans would ever consider taking away your mandatory infotainment system with opt-out ads, that’s now what their donors are paying them for.
I’ve checked the Tennessee subreddit and it doesn’t seem very active. The first post is 17h old and about the special election. The news article that was posted, is not positive for the republican party. The reddit comments are overwhelmingly against Van Epps. The post itself was posted by a mod. https://old.reddit.com/r/Tennessee/comments/1pajj2w/tennessee_congressional_race_becomes_unlikely/
This doesn’t look like a rightwing echo chamber to me. Maybe the outsider that was calling for action, was removed because they take their rule about removing agitators seriously. Imo there may still be a problem of too strict modding, because of how inactive the subreddit looks.
Personally I’d call it buy to play with an unlimited demo and optional mtx. Back when I played it, the default stash tab wasn’t remotely enough, but after spending 20 euros I had enough tabs for all my needs and I then played several seasons without spending anything more. It’s still the best freemium model that I’ve ever encountered imo.
MTG is absolutely a grifter though, she only changed her narrative when she was on the way out already. She’s also planned her retirement from congress to be 2 days after she is entitled to a lifetime congressional pension. She’s a grifter who’s old grift has run it’s course and so now she’s attempting to pivot to something new, grifters gonna grift.
Maybe that the government reactions don’t engage with the anger, is what makes those reactions worthy of inclusion? Actually, scratch that, whether or not those reactions do or don’t acknowledge the anger is irrelevant to whether or not they should be included. Those reactions are relevant to the article because they inform us of what the other involved parties are doing.
In this article those reactions at the end do not fit in with the main story of the angry people, because they don’t acknowledge that anger. I’d call them tone-deaf reactions, but a journalist isn’t allowed to write that (except in opinion pieces), so the journalist can only give those tone-deaf reactions as they were (+ provide some context about them, which I appreciated). That the anger of those people was so far only responded to with tone-deaf reactions, makes those tone-deaf reactions very relevant to the anger of the people.
Not unfocused at all imo. The article says that Hong Kong would traditionally hold an open inquiry in cases like this and then goes on to explain why that is probably not going to happen for this disaster (hint: authoritarians don’t like open enquiries). And then at the end of the article there are some reactions from other more remotely involved parties + some context about those remarks. The end of an article is where those reactions are traditionally put and reactions from various parties are always going to be more varied in nature, but that doesn’t make them non topical or “unfocused”.
This controversy isn’t about the organisations that received a negative recommendation from the independent experts. It’s about the 6 organisations that are losing most/all their subsidies despite getting a positive recommendation. If there is a different controversy about the negative recommendation for samenhuizen’s application, then I’m not aware of that one.
Martinez her lawyer defending her against the public government accusations: https://edition.cnn.com/2025/10/16/us/video/dhs-martinez-car-jimenez-dnt-digvid
Local Chicago breaking news about how the dhs narrative holds no water: https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=CtXQy-NhSPo
The bodycam evidence that completely exonerates Martinez isn’t released yet to the public afaik, at least I couldn’t find it. The bodycam purportedly shows that the ice driver turns the steering wheel to the left to ram into Martinez’ car. Another (or the same?) ice agent is shown on bodycam with a finger on the trigger saying “do something bitch” before shooting her. Martinez her gun was still in her purse when she was shot.
6 left groups are being targeted, not 2. It’s not mentioned by the vrt, but the 4 organisations that fall back on the minimum subsidy are also “coincidentally” organisations that would be considered left by the far right nva. The 6 organisations: Labo vzw, HOTM, Vrede vzw, Vredesactie, GetBasic and Climaxi. The first 2 won’t get a subsidy, the last 4 lose most of their previous subsidy. https://www.vredesactie.be/nieuws/2025/de-vlaamse-regering-vernietigt-niet-alleen-subsidies-voor-kritische-organisaties-ze
Also interesting are the questions being raised in the Flemish parliament. From Bram Jaques:
“Zes organisaties moeten het ontgelden en krijgen de hakbijl op basis van dat plan. Wat wordt hun verweten? De steun die ze betuigen aan gewelddadig extremisme. Bewijs daarvan wordt niet geleverd. Motivering is er niet. Tegenspraak? Nul. Gaat het om een link op een website, een logo, een agenda-item? Niemand die het weet. Wat we wel weten, is dat Vrede vzw en GetBasic vorige legislatuur al een intimiderende inspectie van Jan Jambon aan hun broek kregen, een inspectie die hen volledig vrijpleitte.”
And:
“Wat we nog weten, is dat Vredesactie gelijk kreeg van de rechter in zijn zaak tegen de Vlaamse Regering over de doorvoer van militair materieel naar Israël.”
https://www.vlaamsparlement.be/nl/parlementair-werk/plenaire-vergaderingen/1960271/verslag/1965464
Jos D’Haese his piece is also worth reading.
The nva appears to be going more and more for a full mask off authoritarian style of politics. Not even bothering to make up a proper motivation for arbitrary decisions, intimidation of dissidents, vague made up accusations against experts whose conclusions they don’t like (experts who they themselves had vetted beforehand), …
As a child I read Groosham Grange from Anthony Horowitz, and when I first heard a description of Harry Potter, I thought that they were describing that book from Horowitz. I can’t believe no one else noticed. But I also think that most people active in children’s literature will have an attitude of “anything that gets a child reading, is a good thing”, so they’re not that upset about poor quality being popular and they’d rather keep the positive vibe going.
Civil + military capital punishment was only officially abolished in 1996 in Belgium, so about 133 years between the decision to stop doing it , and actually putting that into law. And a few months after the law was officially changed, the serial murderer + pedophile Dutroux was arrested, after which there was a lot of public support for the death penalty again. A bit of fortunate timing in unfortunate times.
Wrong Lemmy headline, the graphic is about “death penalty for non military crimes”, which implies that there were death penalty executions after those years on the map.
As an example, in Belgium the last execution was in 1950, by firing squad. The Belgian state had extended the state of war to be able to put war criminals & collaborators in front of military tribunals. That last 1918 execution by guillotine was also ordered by a military tribunal, it was a Belgian soldier who had murdered one of his two fiancées plus her unborn child: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emile_Ferfaille Had he not been a soldier, he would most likely not have been executed. The last execution in Belgium that was ordered by a civil court happened in 1863.
I believe that in the past some of them had morals, but that now none of them do.
So Ben Shapiro knows that Trump is a crook, a pedophile, … But he’s more concerned with keeping those scandals covered up than with seeking justice. Keeping their guy in power is more important than any morality, which demonstrates how amoral the entire usa right wing has become.
They had all the information, but chose to ignore it. Whether the decision to ignore the many warnings was due to incompetence or malice is less certain. Personally I believe the latter, mostly because Netanyahu has been blocking a proper investigation for years now.
*“Israeli officials had obtained Hamas’s plan for an unprecedented attack on Israel over a year in advance, but had deemed the scenario to be aspirational”
“In July, however, an analyst from the elite signals intelligence Unit 8200 warned that Hamas had just conducted a military exercise that in many respects resembled the “Jericho Wall” document’s attack plan.”
"the Israeli army turned a deaf ear to repeated warnings from women soldiers posted as spotters on the border with Gaza in the days leading up to the October 7 Hamas attack. "*
The discovery is being cut up, wtf?
First time I heard about that, apparently Texas republicans want it moved to their state for populist reasons, irregardless of any practicalities. https://www.space.com/space-exploration/the-smithsonian-might-have-to-cut-space-shuttle-discovery-into-pieces-to-get-it-to-texas The space shuttles used to be transported on the back of a specially adapted Jumbo jet, which isn’t going to exist anymore, hence the cutting up + exorbitant cost to transport it.
Why are you comparing the peak year of the usa numbers with an average rate over a longer period for the ussr? Insulting others also doesn’t help your credibility. Nothing you said disproves the assertion of the person that you’re calling a liar.