Totally, set theory is deep dark magic and tbh set theorists kinda scare me. Like they’ll gleefully introduce incredibly complicated objects with very little intuition about them
- 20 Posts
- 199 Comments
You know the top left one. They teach that in schools.
I mean… Ideal theory of rings? (Smth like (5) ∪ (7))
Pretty sure this is not AI, you can literally download the krita files on the website
Set theory is relatively lawful.
Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPto
Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zone•multiplication alignment tableEnglish
2·10 天前The third is actually group opertor, but function composition’s not bad either :D
Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPto
Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zone•multiplication alignment tableEnglish
2·10 天前Ahould be alternating product, is a bit fucksd, will fix
Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
unixsocks on fediverse @lemmy.blahaj.zone•what five years of computer science will do to you
6·21 天前What’s that tiler?
Low-key jealous of you having so many windows on a big screen.
Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Unpopular Opinion•‘R-tarded’ is a slur, and I’m sick of otherwise “liberal” people going along with the right’s move to renormalize itEnglish
41·22 天前There is reason to use it. It fits me well sometimes.
Many things do use go, the issue with Java lies in its massive runtime burden (also not a great language IMO)
Idk, there was a time when all my family started getting concerned
Club is a war crime. I rest my case.
A lot of their components are actually already Wayland capable :). But if you want the exact same experience you should probably wait.











yeah, top-left is regular multiplication. Top-center actjally is the so-called alternating product (basically the correct way of defining the cross product).
Top-right is supposed to be the operation in a gtoup.
There’s no explicit cartesian product here but the middle one is the tensor product. The tensor prodict of sets (in so far as that statement makes sense) is the cartesian product.
:)