- 4 Posts
- 45 Comments
UnHiddenOPto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•The Bitcoiners were wrong: a blog post about privacy and bitcoin, and how they failed to design a cash alternative
1414·2 年前Monero doesn’t have most of these problems…
To me, the internet is a place to advertise my inventions, not look at memes.
UnHiddenOPto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•We're building a search engine to compete with DuckDuckGo. No JS, no WASM, no spying. Just a statically generated results page.
728·2 年前That comment is there specifically to drive engagement up with all of the people correcting me in the comments.
UnHiddenOPto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•We're building a search engine to compete with DuckDuckGo. No JS, no WASM, no spying. Just a statically generated results page.
24·2 年前the goal is to prevent competition, not promote it.
UnHiddenOPto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•We're building a search engine to compete with DuckDuckGo. No JS, no WASM, no spying. Just a statically generated results page.
17·2 年前For now we’re going to host on residential connections, and if any ISPs ban us, we’ll just find other ISPs
UnHiddenOPto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•We're building a search engine to compete with DuckDuckGo. No JS, no WASM, no spying. Just a statically generated results page.
91·2 年前Its about reducing attack surface and risk by minimizing dependencies
UnHiddenOPto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•We're building a search engine to compete with DuckDuckGo. No JS, no WASM, no spying. Just a statically generated results page.
55·2 年前The frontend is pure HTML and CSS, you can see what its doing with inspect element, all network requests too
UnHiddenOPto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•We're building a search engine to compete with DuckDuckGo. No JS, no WASM, no spying. Just a statically generated results page.
5·2 年前We also promise to never force Crypto or AI onto users (fuck Brave), since AI and Crypto is a bug, not a feature.
UnHiddenOPto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•We're building a search engine to compete with DuckDuckGo. No JS, no WASM, no spying. Just a statically generated results page.
8·2 年前https://github.com/bedrock-addons Went from 500k downloads and no competitors to a flooded market of clones and my app bsing banned after a fork copyrighted us for “trade dress infringement” despite my app coming first.
https://github.com/du82/client Chinese company sold our code and the company they sold to forced me to shut down so their fork could be the only one around.
https://github.com/du82/privacy-spreadsheet Other groups copied my data and I got nothing in return for my 150+ hours of work
UnHiddenOPto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•We're building a search engine to compete with DuckDuckGo. No JS, no WASM, no spying. Just a statically generated results page.
126·2 年前Our frontend is open, its just HTML and CSS, nothing proprietary client side, which would piss him off.
UnHiddenOPto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•We're building a search engine to compete with DuckDuckGo. No JS, no WASM, no spying. Just a statically generated results page.
291·2 年前To answer your questions in order:
- We have our own index, its not a shitshow of mixed results like Searx tends to be. this also means that we’re not chasing breaking changes of some larger engine when they decide they dont want us, like Twitter did to Nitter, and Bing did to Searx.
- We don’t know how to monetize. Ads are the only option that we know of, donations do not work at all, as proven by my previous projects.
- We’ve already got spam prevention and removal measures in place, but I won’t discuss them.
- We don’t know how to scale it since its centralized by design and the frontend and backend are tightly integrated, largely because the frontend is largely generated on the fly by the backend. Maybe host a copy for each region we’re aiming to acquire users from?
- Our engine already understands 5 languages, and we hope to expand to CJK languages soon.
UnHiddenOPto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•We're building a search engine to compete with DuckDuckGo. No JS, no WASM, no spying. Just a statically generated results page.
1623·2 年前For anyone who asks, we will not open source, but we may offer a licensed self-hosted version for a small yearly fee (maybe $10-20).
I’ve open sourced everything I’ve made in the past, and all that’s happened is someone with more money picks up my project, outcompetes me, and drives me out of business. I dont want our hard work going to waste.
UnHiddento
No Stupid Questions•Has Google’s search results drastically declined for anyone else?
3·2 年前You should look into getting an unlocked pixel with graphene on it
Hey its me the Matrix guy, please message me: @du:nitro.chat my old server was compromised
UnHiddento[Dormant, please move to [email protected]] Movies and TV Shows@lemm.ee•‘Now Where Was I?’ Jon Stewart Is Back in His Old ‘Daily Show’ Seat
15·2 年前Please message me on Matrix, Telegram died. @du:dkwc.org OR @du:nitro.chat
Mailing lists are for old fat unix guys. Who uses email anymore? I can’t even remember the last time I opened my inbox, maybe a month ago for a 2FA code?
I’ll stick with GitHub because its what I know. If you don’t want to use GitHub, then you can still view the spreadsheet, just dont click the GitHub or Datasets links in the fop left.
Status got a recommendation purely because it has proven itself to be resiliant to subpoenas and the cryptography is implemented well.
Nothing is sponsored, and no matter who I work for in the future, it won’t impact the results. It’s open source on GitHub, and I’m looking for contributors to decentralize control of the spreadsheets.



whats LW?