Waryle

Les deux seuls trucs qui freinent la consommation, et donc la pollution, c’est l’éducation et la limite des ressources.

Quand les gens sont mal éduqués (écologiquement, j’entends), et qu’ils ont les moyens de consommer, ça donne le Qatar ou dans une moindre mesure l’Arabie Saoudite ou les États-Unis : on s’étale, on roule en tanks pendant des dizaines de minutes juste pour une pizza, on construit des baraques gigantesques, on se balade en avion tous les 4 matins, on achète 15 tonnes de fringues jetables, on bouffe 15 tonnes de viande.

Et au final on se retrouve avec une empreinte carbone par habitant 3 à 6 fois celle d’un français, ou 7 à 18 fois celle d’un indien.

Pointer du doigt la population comme responsable du réchauffement climatique, c’est se leurrer : si on supprimait la moitié de la population maintenant, tout serait juste deux fois moins cher et la moitié restante consommerait deux fois plus. Bon c’est pas une science exacte mais l’idée est là.

but right now renewable energy is by far cheaper and faster to build than nuclear energy.

No. Building a solar or wind plant is cheaper and faster than building a nuclear plant, sure, but that’s not what we’re aiming for. The goal is to decarbonize electricity by phasing out fossils.

Replacing all fossil-based electricity production nationwide is quite cheap for nuclear when done right (e.g. France, planning for decades and multiple reactors at once, while actually politically supporting your industry, instead of throwing a project once in a while and letting it fight in courts by itself against NIMBY and anti-nuclears).

Replacing fossils with solar and wind power is science fiction. There is not a single country in the world that has decarbonized its electricity without significant decarbonized and controllable electricity capacities, or to name them: hydro or nuclear. Except that you just can’t build hydro anywhere, and most countries’ capacities are limited.

You can’t claim that solar and wind are cheaper than nuclear, because solar and wind just can’t do what nuclear can, and can at best be complementary to other controllable power sources.

Nuclear has never been cost-efficient, it’s just that the costs have been buried in state subsidies to the industry and its supply chain.

A lie repeated again and again.

French Cour des Comptes has released a report, back in 2012, the costs of the french nuclear fleet, everything included: 121 billions of euros between 1960 and 2010.

2,4 billions a year. To provide decarbonized and reliable electricity for decades.

To put in perspective, Germany is more than a trillion of euros in for their Energiewende, or about 40 billions of euros a year for ~25 years, and they still have one of the costliest and dirtiest electricity or Europe, while still not being close to stop coal and having no plan to get out of gas.

And for more perspective, EDF had 118 billions of dollars of revenues in 2024, mostly coming from nuclear, and 11 billions of net results, including the payback of the interests of the debt that the french government imposed on EDF.

Anyone claiming nuclear has never been or can’t be profitable or cost-efficient is either uneducated or a liar.

When done right, nuclear is profitable as fuck, that’s empirically proved.

Which is an ecological measure, not a technical one, and can be circumvented by existing technologies like cooling towers

I’d say too sparse and no user friendly mobile app. Having your friends all in the same place and being able to join them just by downloading an app using an already available store on your phone does wonders

Nope, it’s a Spotify alternative made in France which emphasize on paying a fair share to the artists and providing a great music quality.

What a bad take. Do you also think the Seven Samurai movie shouldn’t be in a museum because it’s not IMAX?

You can’t use Netflix without paying, it’s a subscription. You can use Hyprland without paying anything, you pay because you’re willing to support the project, it’s a donation.

just $10/month year

You’re talking about a 70’s prototype, but that does not mean it would need a kerosene turbine if it was made nowadays. Actually, the Aérotrain S44 used a linear electric motor.

A train brakes by blocking the wheels on two relatively small rails, and the wheels can lose traction.

An aerotrain reverses its propulsion, using it as a brake. No slippage possible here.

It can also bite the rail, having a way bigger braking surface, as well as having an interface dedicated to braking directly on the rail instead of a brake on a wheel on a rail.

And in emergencies, you can even stop the suspension and let the aerotrain rest directly on the rail to brake. That’s a bit brutal and causes damages (at least back in the 70’s), but that stops the Aérotrain quite fast and is way better than derailing or hitting something.

Taking the french Aérotrain advantages:

• Higher speed (due to inexistant rail drag)
• More comfortable
• Less noise
• Faster braking
• Way cheaper rails and maintenance (just concrete rails that don’t get rolled on, no steel)
• Rails can be easily elevated, taking less space on the ground and avoiding intersections with roads as well as landlocking. Basically, you can cross fields without bothering farmers too much

J’aime quand les gens partagent leur satisfaction, c’est haut-vote et je t’encourage pour la suite, et belle mie !

Les règles d’une femme peuvent être décalées à cause du stress ou d’une maladie, et plein de choses d’autres. Il n’y a rien d’alarmant à ce qu’une piqûre suivie d’une réponse immunitaire décale un peu les règles de certaines femmes, et ce n’est absolument rien de grave.

You needlessly want to punish tens of thousands of people for the acts of a few hundred. It’s cruel, pointless and very damaging, and your tirades from a high-school essay only support the shallowness and immaturity of your thinking. I won’t waste any more time on you.

You want to use the “throw everybody out and see what happens”, and you claim how much better things would be under your governance.

You’re talking like a Elon Musk wanna-be, even using shitty metaphors that mask all the complexity of the problems, and the cruelty that these kinds of decisions imply.

You want to throw 20k employees out without any consideration for the economic and personal consequences, not to mention all the other companies around who will see their business sometimes heavily impacted.

All this to make a stupid metaphor. You’re 14 at best.

How old are you?

The workers, the gamers, and the industry are glad you’re not in charge of anything, punishing them for things they have no control over, and wasting good talents and infrastructure.

No, make it a entirely employee-owned company, so they can vote the execs out, sanitize the culture, and keep the thousands of worker out of unemployment

You can look up for:

• Setting up max authentication attemps per connection -> slows up a lot brute force attacks. If your password is strong enough, that’s already a big step to secure your server.
• Generate SSH Keys and disable password authentication -> do this only if you’re connecting through the same devices, because you won’t be able to connect from any device that has not being set up. Personally I don’t use this because I want to be able to access my server even if I’m not home and without my laptop
• Set up Crowdsec -> it’s a local service which scans logs and will block access to any suspicious IPs. It also relies on a crowdsourced list of IPs that are identified as threat and will preventively block them

Tu n’as fait aucun effort, 11 pages c’est rien à survoler pour récupérer l’information, et t’as littéralement un résumé page 2…

Tu mélanges les enjeux sanitaires et écologiques. Pour un parisien, faire construire une voiture électrique en Chine, ça ne va pas lui filer un cancer des poumons et/ou réduire son espérance de vie en bonne santé, contrairement aux particules fines issues de la combustion, du roulement et du freinage des voitures qui passent dans sa rue. C’est sur ce deuxième point que les ZFE agissent, et c’est ce qui a toujours été visé.

Pour l’écologie, notamment éviter les émissions de gaz à effet de serre, bien entendu il ne faut pas jeter le parc automobile actuel pour tout remplacer par de l’électrique. Il faut tout bonnement réduire les déplacements, surtout ceux effectués via les modes de transports les plus émetteurs, à savoir la voiture, et favoriser les alternatives.

Ça tombe bien, parce que Paris réduit aussi fortement la place de la voiture dans ses rues et pousse de plus en plus les gens vers les transports en commun et le vélo, et ça porte également ses fruits.