• 4 Posts
  • 955 Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年7月1日

help-circle
  • I would argue that, without the punctuation, it’s not technically correct. The references to James and John saying “had had,” at least, should be in quotes. Additionally, unless broken up with a semicolon or a period before the final four “hads,” it’s a run-on sentence.

    If you change the “hads” that mean provided/said in the context of the sentence (excluding the quoted ones), you could write it as:

    James, while John had [said] “had”, had [said] “had had”; “had had” had [provided] a better effect on the teacher.

    And though it doesn’t flow right to me to have James and his action verb split by a phrase about John, I’m not sure that’s incorrect. Phrasing it to fix the flow, for me, would be:

    While John had [said] “had”, James had [said] “had had”; “had had” had [provided] a better effect on the teacher.















  • Also, toys. You can choose what size you prefer. This works in both same and different sex partnerships. Toys (in conjunction with an observant partner) are awesome. I’ve yet to meet a woman who was uncomfortable with us using toys together but have, unfortunately, encountered men who feel inadequate if toys are involved.




  • You are correct that it would be a felony, however that could be the case for throwing anything at anyone. I said it would make me happy, which is not the same as telling people it’s a safe or legal thing to do, nor that they should actually do it.

    Thank you for clarifying for folks but everyone should take this as a reminder that you should take anything you read on the internet with a grain of salt.