lmfao the notion that the feds would try to crush socialism by directly inviting us to study forces that have successfully fought off the US military is so funny to me.
- 0 Posts
- 155 Comments
I’d say that’s a ridiculous choice and it’s time to organize with the masses against the system that presented it to us; rather than undermine that effort by treating the system as legitimate and shaming others for not seeing the candidates and their futures the way I did.
Hand me two cups of shit, I still have free will to throw them back in your face. The system can force feed if it wants but you won’t see me voluntarily picking a shit cup and eating shit.
I didn’t think I’d have to say this, but the conditions in which we exist are created by the system under which we exist. As Kamala said, you didn’t just fall out of a coconut tree.
It also wasn’t just smooth sailing up to this point; capitalism suffers crises like these on a regular basis. For example, the 15 recessions just in the years between great depression (1929) and the COVID-19 pandemic (2020).
A system is designed to do what it does. If it doesn’t do what the designers intended, it gets changed. Otherwise, it stays the same. You would think if these results were unintended, the system would have been changed by now.
let’s work on making sure the only dictator is the working class ✊🏾
as for nobility, well, nobility doesn’t mean much if working class doesn’t lend it any political or economic power.
You literally could have just read the sources posted by the OP when someone asked, 3 whole hours before you posted this
I’ve found sativa in particular can amplify any anxiety I’m having. Used to love it too lol, don’t know what happened.
My adhd also goes off the wall though so it’s always fascinated me that people use it to manage theirs.
Have you experienced addiction with THC? I personally haven’t and I’ve used a lot of it. Maybe habitual, nothing like withdrawal symptoms, but I have a specific time of day that using it is even an option. Every body is different though so I’m genuinely curious.
Also, lets be real, tradesman is a pretty neurodiverse job choice.
If you’re neurodiverse and good at school, you go into engineering. If you’re neurodiverse and better with your hands, you go into a trade. And there’s even some mobility between the two to make my point.
I’ve had so many people be surprised when I tell them caffeine gives me major anxiety…I thought it was common knowledge that it did that but apparently it’s not. Glad to see some organic outside confirmation lol.
I can think of a myriad other reasons than sheer cost
Tell me what those are and how they can’t be solved with capital
downvoting
They’re fake internet points, you don’t get anything for them. You said something and people expressed disagreement. Don’t sweat it.
People say landlords provide a service that is providing housing to another person without them having to pay the full cost of homeownership. Yet, because the landlord is not only covering their costs but extracting as much profit as the market will allow, the cost and experience of renting is pretty damn competitive with that of ownership. So to answer your question,
Are landlords supposed to protect people from increasing costs of home ownership?
Yes, that is the way most non-landlords justify the existence of landlords to themselves. The alternative is to acknowledge that landlords exist only for the sake of enabling the owning class to generate capital for themselves by exploiting the working class.
He really just does it as a hobby. Love of the game.
immediately after you flop
Where did that happen??
Press should be free period, and the audience should hold them to a higher standard than they do
These are mutually exclusive demands. You cannot have a “free press” that is also “held to a higher standard”. Either they’re free to report what they want and be influenced by outside interests, or they’re held to a standard of fact-based and unbiased reporting. The two are almost never going to coincide, especially in a system driven by capital. Whether you want to face that reality or not is your prerogative.
You’d rather western press where they can publish any lie and denial of reality that suits capital interests? There are certain lies propagated by the west for the purpose of destabilizing the DPRK, which I don’t believe the DPRK is obligated to let float around in order for me to respect their democratic sovereignty.
You just won’t convince me that it’s a bad thing to enforce a shared observable reality which can be questioned and improved upon but not invented out of whole cloth to serve imperialist interests. The people don’t need to be told what their interests are; they’re the ones living their daily lives to observe that, and should be the ones doing the telling. Anything reported to them should be a plain factual recounting of events.
A democracy based on lies and manipulation is no democracy at all, which ironically happens to be what we have here in the west. For as “free” as our media purports to be, good luck getting any reach without a capitalist backing you in some form (especially before social media but even today; now that they’ve captured a large enough audience; the capitalists behind big tech are tightening up on what is allowed to have a platform). Which explains why you always see westerners project that onto any country they consider worse off and “authoritarian”, as if that is the sole reason why and actually “the free press” makes us immune to it.
causepix@lemmy.mlto
Memes@lemmy.ml•Yes, i started playing the Autism funny game. 1 Week in, 16 hours only
1·11 天前I’m the opposite. Love automation (literally a programmer by trade lol), hate hate hate base building.
causepix@lemmy.mlto
Memes@lemmy.ml•Yes, i started playing the Autism funny game. 1 Week in, 16 hours only
1·11 天前I’ve never played the game. Been meaning to for a while but so far have really only heard third-hand accounts of it. From the very little I know though that seems like a real possibility and honestly I prefer that interpretation.
@[email protected] 's explanation gave me the impression it was nature’s way of fighting back against unsustainable practices. Like it lets you play as a bad guy and see the consequences of doing so, rather than pitting you against some diagetic evil and painting everything you do in a morally justified light.
I might have to eat crow on this one though, like I said I don’t even have entry level knowledge here.
causepix@lemmy.mlto
United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml•Protein Powders and Shakes Contain High Levels of Lead
5·13 天前There’s a section about this in the article. Plants take up lead from the soil they grow in (This phenomenon is actually well known and sometimes employed to decontaminate soil in brownfields; those plants aren’t used for human consumption though obvs) However, the companies don’t disclose where their raw goods are sourced from so it’s impossible to know for sure.


The point is I’m not going to lend you any legitimacy by picking up the shit and eating it myself, then turning at the people around me and asking why they aren’t eating it yet. I’m going to make it impossible for the shit peddler to hide their willingness and ability to abuse their power. If I’m eating shit either way, why would I do it in a way that makes it apparent to outsiders that I’m choosing to eat shit?
And no, when you scold people for not participating in a system, you are not just not “refusing to acknowledge its legitimacy”. You are promoting it, whether you care to or not. You are promoting the idea that everyone is choosing these options out of complete and true support of complete and unbiased information. This is especially true when people like you misrepresent and refuse to understand the arguments of those who choose to abstain or vote third party.
You are saying, “if you participate in this system, you could change the way things are going; and if you don’t, then you implicitly consent to it”, which is simply not true. Interestingly enough, you know how little power a person has when acting as an individual, which is why you minimize the reach of individuals when it comes to forms of political action other than voting, but you never apply it to the situation of voting where the ruling class has vast numbers of ways to influence people’s behaviors in whatever direction they want.
The change can only come when we have built the ability to move cohesively as a class, or a voting bloc if you will, that can either take power for itself or force our leaders to come to our table if they want our compliance. We can only build this by overcoming the resentment we hold for other members of our class, and putting one foot in front of the other; turning one person at a time towards the inner workings of the machine that the ruling class works so hard to hide. Not by stoking resentment and wasting our energy trying to manipulate an illegitimate system while we wait around for the movement to build itself.