I remember dating a girl with a bedroom full of them. The relationship went exactly as expected.

Roundhouse kick.

As a former Gator, this tracks.

Does entropy have a knife?

Always upvote SeaLab

Tomorrow: “Trump makes unilateral decision to attack Iran.”

For anyone keeping count, that’s about a day and a half per week.

By all means, keep accepting everything you read at face value. You’ll be a fucking Republican in no time.

“Everyone who doesn’t agree with me is a bot.”

Yeah, let’s push Hello Games to release before it’s ready. It worked so well last time.

As long as I can still get my truck stop boner pills I’m good.

‘Republicans’ and ‘bombing the middle east’, name a more iconic duo.

Ok, here’s the deal. If you want to make a case for this, that’s fine. HOWEVER (and it’s a big ‘however’) we can’t just sound like the same people who cried foul over Trump’s lost election. We have to provide verifiable and independently verified proof.

In the primary article, we’re lacking evidence that Tripp Lite UPS devices actually manipulated votes. There’s no documentation of vote manipulation occurring at all, no verified communications proving coordination between the named parties, and the statistical anomalies are described but not rigorously analyzed or peer-reviewed.

The article builds an elaborate theory by connecting real business relationships and technological capabilities, but it doesn’t provide evidence that these connections were actually used for election manipulation. It assumes malicious intent based on proximity and capability rather than proving actual wrongdoing.

The Common Coalition Report has many of the same flaws, chief among them being a lack of peer-reviewed evidence. Claims about man-in-the-middle attacks are technically possible, but unproven, and the connection between corporate partnerships and vote manipulation is purely speculative.

If you want to present this as the truth, then we need transparent statistical methodology, which means we don’t cherry-pick data, and we can’t mix legitimate concerns with unsubstantiated technical claims. While this report contains some legitimate concerns about voter suppression and references some real statistical analysis, the core claims about systematic vote manipulation through satellite networks and corporate conspiracies remain largely unsubstantiated. The evidence presented is primarily circumstantial, and extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof that simply isn’t provided here.

The document appears designed more to persuade than to present rigorous evidence, using emotional appeals and political rhetoric alongside data points. That isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but it isn’t something we should be presenting to the general public as fact, lest we look like conspiracy theorists. Verify the facts, then present the evidence—all else is folly.

I’ve done this in CIV and it didn’t work out that well…

Because the FCC is holding licenses hostage.

I don’t know what Disney’s pullis on the og prints, but this would be massive pull to Disney+.

Funny, that’s exactly what I planned to do if I ever saw a fucking rally on the side of the road.

They pay the cat deposit on my new place, where ever that may be. I’ll take a cat as well, though.

I’ll do mine for 2.7 and a cat deposit.

Voight has been a ahithead longer than most people have been alive. I hope he dies soon.