It definitely is. Got at coworker who uses that as a treating every time we talk. There are also others I have heard say the same.

It seems to be a regional thing though, so might just not be a thing in your area.

Something like it yeah. Notice that left woman is holding a glass (just at edge of image).

Middle girl probably also held one, and it has been removed by whatever edited the image.

Ted

[edit] no achievement hunter fans here I guess.

People seems to forget that football is the secondary focus of the head of FIFA. Corruption is the name of the game for him.

Yeah, this has become an issue for us at work as well.

Currently we are doing a POC for an in-house developed solution where a azure function app handles the renewal of certificates for any domain we have, both wildcard and named, and place the certificates in a key vault where services that need them can get access.

Looks to be working, so the main issue now is finding a non-US certificate provider that supports acme. EU has some but even more local there aren’t many options.

You “figured it out”?

He literally says in the video it is due to sound.

Sound.

He isn’t gaming, so he didn’t need a powerfull gaming card that can get noicy.

He just needed something that can drive his two monitors (think they were 8k), and be silent.

Yeah, there is plenty of systems who do the things that Microsoft does.

But I don’t know anyone who does it all so integrated as Microsoft does.

Let’s say you start with the basic: you need office apps, email and storage. You have several who sell systems like that, many of them cheaper than Microsoft.

Then you want security for your email. Iyou can go out and find some supplier for something like that, or you can buy an extra license and get EOP.

Then you need client protection. You can go out and find a supplier, or you can buy a license and get endpoint protection.

And since you now have EOP and endpoint protection, you can just buy the security step up from Microsoft, and you get a whole bunch more security solutions, all integrate.

Oh and you need dataloss prevention and other such compliance solutions, so might as well go for E5, so you get whole compliance package.

I really wish that someone could give Microsoft proper competition, because they really need it, but as it is right now, there just isn’t any unless you want to do a lot more work than it is to go for Microsoft.

Good that more people become aware of this, but should be noted that this isn’t something secret.

This was the main critique of the new outlook client when it came.

The main issue, and this is also mentioned in the blog post, is that the bot only does translation and not localisation.

The first is just taking the words from one language and changing to another.

The second is to actually make sure the text in the new language makes proper sense. Maybe the English article uses some analogy that does realy make sense in the new language. Localisation is to find some other suitable analogy to use instead, so that the point from the main article is kept, but it still makes sense.

Porn

Which is stupid, since the reason they had 3/3 was that two people could not collaborate to change the results, which they now can with 2/3.

Should have been changed to 3/5 instead.

I’m on my phone now, so I don’t have the links, but if you find Billet Labs reddit account and check their comments from around when this all happened, you will find a couple of comments where they admit they only asked for it back after the video, and that LTT offered to get it back for them.

The rest (why it wasn’t sent back) is from a wan shows from the same period.

Posted this to someone else here, so I’ll just copy that post:

You are of course talking about the Billet Labs prototype they has been told they could keep, but Billet Labs changed their mind after the video (valid, since LTT did fuck that video up), but a mistake was made by someone in logistics at LTT so it wasn’t put aside for return as it should.

And when it got known by LTT that it had happened, they first offered to get the prototype back from the person who bought it, which Billet Labs said no to, then offered to pay them back the cost of the prototype.

Is that what you mean by “steals”

You are of course talking about the Billet Labs prototype they has been told they could keep, but Billet Labs changed their mind after the video (valid, since LTT did fuck that video up), but a mistake was made by someone in logistics at LTT so it wasn’t put aside for return as it should.

And when it got known by LTT that it had happened, they first offered to get the prototype back from the person who bought it, which Billet Labs said no to, then offered to pay them back the cost of the prototype.

Is that what you mean by “steals”

The main issue there is that project zero, where if you ignore what Google has reported, they will just go ahead and disclose the issue.

Because later the lines get fixed.

Ars has an article on this where it is confirmed that this is YouTube bowing to Trump and his sanctions of these groups due to their work with the ICC against Netanyahu.

Doesn’t look like you have set any limitations on uploading to it?

I’ll just go ahead and upload my 20TB or so of linux ISOs to your public facing website where everyone can see what is uploaded to it…

We do, through the EEA.