Personally? No I’ve never bought a cert before. Given there’s free alternatives and it’s a homelab it doesn’t make sense. Otherwise I’ve used them on AWS, where ACM also just provides them for free.
What you’re saying is that certificate providers will still charge you and provide certificates for a year, but just provide you with N certificates to span that year?
E.g. if the duration is 45 days then they will give you 365/45 certificates ?
Or this monster:
James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher
Don’t worry they’ll reduce the cost of certificates proportionally to the longevity of the certificate.
Right? Anybody?
<< Cricket noises >>
Edit: obviously not LE, but other certificate vendors.
Ah, since the tweet claimed we won I assumed the vote had already went through.
Edit: well “prevented” anyway. So I assumed it didn’t pass and was voted on.
Is there a list somewhere I can see how the MEPs voted?
On my android device there’s a setting in the advanced settings that says it should be able to do this.
On MacOs… Not a clue sorry :( maybe there’s something similar in the settings?
I CAN LIVE WITH THAT AS LONG AS YOU I CAN STILL HAVE MY AVOCADO TOAST.
anywhere
Don’t shove him here we don’t need drilling fluids in our sewage system either.
I like this idea. Nice.
Most annoying thing I’ve encountered is ms teams completely freezing the device when using the webcam in a meeting.
On my work device that is.
And once the sub stops you lose access to the games.
I don’t fully agree. Mails from companies ( password resets, ads, … ) aren’t necessarily passing by Google/m$ servers. So you’ve got that privacy. If you use an aliasing service ( which they also seem to offer ) then they can’t tie it directly to the same person/email.
So there definitely is some privacy gain, though if you’re emailing [email protected] and [email protected], the whole conversation is available to that bigtech firm as the email will be sent in plaintext.
I’d say it’s a step in the right direction.
I don’t know atomic mail, so I can’t vouch for them. I’m also not able to do proper research on it right now. So maybe somebody else can pitch in on that part.
Imagine supertuxcart overtaking rocket league. Ah well. One can dream.
I wonder if I can get a refund because my game no longer works due to changes on their end.
Is that basically the same as running docker/podman in combination with Rosetta?
Pretty sure actual scientists would also be quite happy with 3 trillion dollars to try and cute cancer.
The hand strikes me as odd. I’m also not entirely sure if it’s actually able to bend that far comfortably while holding a sign. But the picture is also blurry around her hand. So it’s hard to make out and I could be wrong. It feels like something is off though, which is a feeling I rarely get with pictures unless they’re deliberately trying some optical illusion or are obviously fabricated.
She’s quite small. It looks like the door is 2-3x her height. It could just be a really tall door I guess .
Edit: looked at the picture again and it feels like she’d be the height of the doorknob if she was standing in front of it.
Those studios bring back some good memories…
Where is this even coming from? The guy above me is saying not to give devs better hardware and to teach them to code better.
I followed up with an example of how using indices in a database to boost the performance helped more than throwing more hardware at it.
This has nothing to do with having worked on old code. Stop trying to pull my comment out of context.
But yes you’re right. Adding indexes to a database does nothing to solve adding a new feature in the scenario you described. I also never claimed it did.
Interesting. Thanks for that insight :)