This might partially answer your question: https://github.com/ollama/ollama/issues/5186.

It looks like the answer is, it depends on what you want to run as some configs are partially supported but there’s no clear cut support yet?

Its all about the disruption. But protesting isn’t the only thing that people should be doing. Community building is just as important if not more so.

Source-available isn’t the same as free and open-source. You might not be able to distribute or modify as you like to the former and may have any sort of license provisioned with further restrictions.

I’m sure it would persist even after an event of malicious activity. It may just turn out like email with servers needing to be added to an allowlist at worst and more moderation. I think scalability might be the limiting factor at some point though and as a result we could end up with several disconnected islands of server clusters instead of globally meshed servers.

They were new in the 1700s. They are not a new thing for humans today. If you don’t use vaccines you are an outlier to modern society.

Looks like it’s because it’s labeled as a Higher-Speed Rail rather than High-speed.

Even if they could reuse a DKIM hash on an email (pretty sure this is unique per email and would fail on a legitimate check), SPF would show its obviously not from Google. So just make sure your email server correctly handles DKIM verification and blocks SPF hard fails, and you’re probably good against this.

I see this as a failure of society. We have not only neglected the safety of a cyclist and failed to memorialize this person for those that miss them, but also neglected the needs of someone who has resorted to stealing.

I think OPs question is still relevant in that context. Does that case reduce their effort towards privacy? I believe the answer is yes.

Biggest takeaway; the media is still in denial.

Absolutely, yes. I’ve found that sometimes the only way I get a response out is to do a paragraph stream of thought which I then regret because. But sometimes it’s fine. It’s hard to gauge honesty.

I agree that ecologically it can be a better move but I also don’t blame anyone that chooses to have a child because who knows when politicians may revoke your ability to decide in the future.

The real problem is that our current way of life is a sinking ship and we’re close to the tipping point when the majority of people will need to find methods of living alternatively. Teaching younger people how to survive in this environment is going to be crucial. A lot will suffer through our collective ignorance until we find a new equilibrium with nature. We can adapt quickly and support climate positive actions or we can prolong it; I think we all know the current direction we’re going. Either way, until either the global ecological demand subsides, we’re just preparing future generations for an uphill battle.

I think it’s less on ceding metaphorical ground and more on getting people caught up that haven’t decoupled the “Jewish people are automatically Zionist” thought yet. The opposition is taking advantage of that preconceived notion that a lot of people have.

Do you mean the actual philosophy of truth or do you just mean that we currently have a cult of personality spewing lies and people en masse accept it as truth?

Because I’ve heard arguments for both.

I may be naive but why wouldn’t a UN governed state not be in the best interest for all parties? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_separatum_(Jerusalem)

We’re clearly not from the same countries, but I think this discussion stems from the recent political actions in the USA. In that instance, yes birthright citizenship is the most common method of citizenship and would have severe consequences by changing the law arbitrarily.

The world’s a fucked up place, and birthright citizenship probably isn’t the best way to go about things (neither are borders in general but that’s a tangent), but I don’t think removing rights before a better implementation is in place is the best way to go about things. More people get hurt this way, obviously, and we lose sight of what the actual point of this was. Not to mention it’s easy for fascism to take root when you can more easily say who gets to be a citizen.

And what are the benefits of authoritarian rule for its citizens? Given enough time, those rulers will cause harm in any circumstance.

It does a few techniques depending on the type of network and security obstacles. They posted an article on it that’s interesting.

I’d also check out pangolin or headscale like others recommeded though since you’re already looking to self-host.

Its because they genuinely do not care about anyone but themselves.

If someone was layed off, that’s too bad, find another job slacker. Someone ran over by a car, they shouldn’t have been in the way. Someone shot, that’s a bad neighborhood. Someone shot by police? They should’ve followed orders better.

They do not comprehend that there is more to things than just cause and effect because of the doublethink that has eroded away their critical thinking skills.