The no privacy part is probably going to be true.

The robot stuff is pure sci-fi to me though. Even if robots become so diverse and capable so quickly to be able to actually replace workers in most fields, the way capitalism works isn’t compatible with that. If most of the workforce is now machines, capitalists have no workers to steal surplus value from, and also have very small demand for their products because all of the working class will be impoverished.

So even if we get to that point technologically, replacing workers would either happen after capitalism has ended, or it wouldn’t happen by design.

Then why did they lock the fucking thread as controversial if it was such an innocent change?

It’s paving the wave to implement a Californian law that can very easily end up meaning ID verification for everything.

They could just not have done this at zero cost but decide to go to multiple projects, at this specific time which obviously isn’t coincidental, and actively work to start implementing this on Linux. I guess “Contributed to systemd” on their CV was more valuable than resisting the USA taking control of the whole internet and ending all sense of privacy.

Wow that’s an insane level of bootlicking, it was completely free for them to do absolutely nothing about this nonsense law and give the middle finger if asked by the US

I didn’t care before but it turns out the systemd haters were on to something for a long time, fuck these owners for even considering this and even locking the PR to avoid valid criticism, I hope all the contributors create a fork, jump ship and never let the previous owners commit a single line of code to it

I’ve got a 2007 laptop that was shitty even for its time, and it does the job perfectly as a home server with Debian and a few good open source services I want to host

Knowing how to code is now “syntax heavy”

god I hate this world

Might as well use curl at that point

It’s foss but got purchased by Kong and started becoming a bit too much of a product for my liking, it has a fork called insomnium that keeps development where it used to be before but it’s no longer maintained sadly

Southern Europe, went from 1,7 euro/liter approximately to about 1,85 recently, so about 9% increase.

Salt, pepper, allspice and cloves. Goes really nicely with olive oil and onions

Same thing. The “liberals” that Americans associate with the Democratic party, is also neoliberalism.

And “neo” or not, the only thing it has to do with liberty is the liberty of capitalists to do anything in the name of profit, never had anything to do with liberty for the people.

launches strike

declares state of emergency across country

So it’s holding its own people as human shields I hear?

I think Claude account PRs should absolutely be banned, that’s the easiest counter measure to implement too

“Example: fall detection” Sure buddy, that’s what this was intended for

I get this too on the web ui, though some images load so it could be some network thing

Some people clutch their pearls nowadays at how the Soviets dealt with Nazis, but seeing the modern equivalent to them with our own eyes proves that the Soviets were being very merciful to those monsters

I was literally thinking this last night after I saw that some settlers showed a hostage a livestream of his home and then bombed his pregnant wife in it… I think we’re at the point where we can definitely say that Israelis are worse than the Nazis now

Of course nothing will be done about the drug importing shipping capitalists though

Really, no mention of Mossad and Israel? What a complete mystery

A present day AI makes an educated guess which existing source code snippets best match the request, does some testing, and submits code that it judges is most likely to pass code review.

That’s still on the human that opened the PR without doing the slightest effort of testing the AI changes though.

I agree there should be a lot of caution overall, I just think that the problem is a bit mischaracterized. The problem is the newfound ability to spam PRs that look legit but are actually crap, but the root here is humans doing this for Github rep or whatever, not AI inherently making codebases vulnerable. There need to be ways to detect such users that repeatedly do zero effort contributions like that and ban them.

I’m no fan of AI generally, but “AI Vulnerable” as a term just doesn’t make much sense to me. Code reviewing should be filtering out bad code whether it originates from an AI or a human.

PR spamming with the usage of AI is another problem which is very serious and harmful for OSS, but that’s not due to some unique danger that only AI code has and human contributors don’t.