If you are designing the french government communication systems, would signal work for your requirements?
- 1.04K Posts
- 12.8K Comments
Signal is safe enough depending on your threat model
If you worry about aws centralization and outages then signal isn’t a good option
If your worried about sgx enclave exploitation then it’s not a good match
If your worried about us intelligence monitoring traffic then it’s not a good fit
So signal is fine for person to person western traffic
Not a good fit for a country needing isolated highly secure messaging… I.e. the french government should NOT use signal, centralized in America, sgx exploits are a concern, and exposing the social and communication graph to the us intelligence services isn’t in the french national interest
Simple poc test. Turn off your iphone, get a new iphone. Sign into icloud, can you access your images without manually typing in a key?
If not… The it’s probably e2e
They aint your bros…
jet@hackertalks.comto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What's the oldest video game you still find yourself playing?English
6·2 天前Factorio 2016
jet@hackertalks.comto
MealtimeVideos Cafe@lemmy.cafe•Why Are New Appliances So Bad? [41:02]English
1·4 天前Let’s all buy speed queens for $4000!
This is my experience, if your friendly you get into friendly lobbies. Including teams!
However if your not friendly it doesn’t take much to be cast into pvp lobbies! Go on a raid with a trigger happy friend…
It takes something like 10 non-pvp rounds to get into the friendly lobbies
And even one kos round will put you into pvp land.
So matchmaking is quick to put pvp people together, and slow to pull PvE people out of pvp.
But even the ideal PvE lobby isn’t 100% friendlies. It’s 85-95% friendlies, with one or two antisocial people for flavor.
When I spawn in I watch for raider flares and if I see more then I few I knows it’s a pvp lobby and just exit asap
jet@hackertalks.comtoHacker News@lemmy.bestiver.se•Cancer Is Surging, Bringing a Debate About Whether to Look for ItEnglish
1·5 天前Using the metabolic theory of cancer the more people know about their cancer risks the more steps they will take to improve their metabolic health.
jet@hackertalks.comto
MealtimeVideos Cafe@lemmy.cafe•When the director uses real bullets [11:34]English
5·6 天前Everyone should watch come and see, and when your done watching it… Go for a quiet walk.
How many people are getting 150g of real bioavailabile protein every day?
jet@hackertalks.comto
Privacy@programming.dev•Looking for a federated alternative to Signal as they might have to comply with ChatControl, I tried SimpleX, XMPP, Matrix, NextCloud Talk and DeltaChat. It was quite a rideEnglish
1·7 天前Evergreen resources when IM comes up:
https://eylenburg.github.io/im_comparison.htm
https://www.privacyguides.org/en/real-time-communication/
Fwiw Ive tried them all, signal is the most accessible and I have hope for simplex, which hasn’t had any measurable impact on my battery
jet@hackertalks.comOPMto
Friendly Carnivore@discuss.online•The War on Meat Continues - [Paper] Beneficial Bloodsucking 2025English
2·7 天前its basically poisoning the food supply with extra steps, which i think is ridiculous to try to frame poisoning food as a ethical thing to do.
jet@hackertalks.comOPMto
Friendly Carnivore@discuss.online•The War on Meat Continues - [Paper] Beneficial Bloodsucking 2025English
1·7 天前deleted by creator
jet@hackertalks.comOPMto
Friendly Carnivore@discuss.online•The War on Meat Continues - [Paper] Beneficial Bloodsucking 2025English
2·7 天前And this is what they are willing to say in public! Imagine what they really think
jet@hackertalks.comtoHacker News@lemmy.bestiver.se•We gave 5 LLMs $100K to trade stocks for 8 monthsEnglish
3·8 天前They should do value at risk and factor based %s to evaluate how much risk the models are taking on unintentionally
A good outcome doesn’t mean the decision making process isn’t bad
https://community.frame.work/t/framework-supporting-far-right-racists/75986
We support open source software (and hardware), and partner with developers and maintainers across the ecosystem. We deliberately create a big tent, because we want open source software to win. We don’t partner based on individuals’ or organizations’ beliefs, values, or political stances outside of their alignment with us on increasing the adoption of open source software. We’ve sent out large quantities of hardware to folks at Fedora, Bluefin, Bazzite, NixOS, Arch Linux, Linux Mint, Omarchy, and many other distros, and have sponsored either the organizations directly or events with Linux Foundation, LVFS, NixOS, Debian, KDE, Hyprland, and others. Within the team itself, personal distro and OS preferences span basically every Linux distro you can imagine along with FreeBSD. I personally am running machines with Fedora (for machine learning), Bazzite (for gaming), Omarchy (general productivity), and Windows 11 (when I have to).
I definitely understand that not everyone will agree with taking a big tent approach, but we want to be transparent that bringing in and enabling every organization and community that we can across the Linux ecosystem is a deliberate choice.
Edit to add: This is a comment I recently added deep in this thread, but pasting it here so that folks don’t need to dig through to find it:
Update on Oct 14th, 2025:\
A number of folks have reached out to us over the last few days to ask that we share more about which organizations we sponsor. This is certainly something we should have been doing already for transparency, and today we’ve published the list of all of our 2025 sponsorships so far, which total around $215,000. We’ll be keeping this list up to date over time. In addition, we would love nominations of a broader set of mission-aligned organizations we can sponsor, and we’ve created a submission form for this. As you can see from the list for this year, our focus is primarily around funding organizations developing Linux distros and window managers, open source firmware, educational organizations doing open source hardware development, and open source infrastructure that our hardware products and website depend on.
Since this thread started in part around our donation to Hyprland, we wanted to provide additional specific context there. We decided a few months ago to be more deliberate about funding the maturity of the Linux desktop by providing support to both distros and window managers. On the latter, we started sponsorship discussions with the GNOME Foundation ($1,000/month), KDE Foundation ($10,000/year), and Hyprland (600€/month) at the same time, with the plan to announce them together. We sent the funding to Hyprland and GNOME Foundation last week, and have been working with KDE Foundation to finalize our sponsorship. We’ve also been working with GNOME Foundation on announcement timing, as they needed to update the sponsor list on their site. We missed on letting Hyprland know that we wanted to announce these together, and they shared the sponsorship shortly after receiving it last week.
On Hyprland specifically, we were aware that there was past toxicity and controversy in their community, so we did research into it before deciding if we could sponsor the project. What we found was that there were past failures in moderation early in the creation of the project that had resulted in a toxic community, that the project lead vaxry had overhauled moderation years ago as a result, and that the community as it currently stands does not represent the one in which the issues occurred. Over the last few days, we’ve gotten additional outreach from others in the community who were initially concerned about our sponsorship of Hyprland who did their own research and came to a similar conclusion to what we did.
Going forward on this topic:
- We are going to continue to update our list of sponsorships as we go to give transparency on what we’re monetarily backing. As noted above, in general we want to coordinate the updates with the organizations we sponsor so that their website updates and announcements happen around the same time as ours.
- We’re requesting that you provide additional nominations of mission-aligned organizations that we should sponsor. Note that in the near-to-mid term, we’re still prioritizing organizations focused on open source firmware, software, and hardware that make the ecosystem around our products more mature and accessible. If you have recommendations of other good organizations, please feel free to submit those in the form as well, but they may come into future funding cycles.
- Before we sponsor an organization, we will continue to research and confirm that as they currently exist, they uphold appropriate community standards and are structurally set up for that to continue to be the case.
- Although this thread has continuously spiraled into unproductive directions that have needed active moderation, we do still plan to keep it open for now and merge additional related new threads into it. Please remember to follow our forum rules though and keep conversation productive and free of personal attacks.
I’m tired of endless purity tests, judge companies on the work they do. Not that they didn’t hold the line on some canceled developer
Moderates
Actual Discussion@lemmy.ca
> [email protected]@lemm.ee
> [email protected]@lemm.ee
- jet's interesting finds@hackertalks.com
Friendly Carnivore@discuss.online
Low Carb High Fat - Ketogenic@discuss.online
Metabolic Health@discuss.online
Media Reviews@hackertalks.com
Applied Paranoia@hackertalks.com
South East Asia - SEA@hackertalks.com






Then signal probably isn’t for you