

I’m sorry but I can’t take this serious anymore.
TeenyTiny™ really desperately wants the conversation to change away from the [email protected]
I’m sorry but I can’t take this serious anymore.
TeenyTiny™ really desperately wants the conversation to change away from the [email protected]
Won’t be seen much on US telly for obvious reasons
I agree too much was made out of the pubic hair thing in the media, but I think they do this deliberately, so there’s a sense of ‘relief’ afterwards of “ah ok, it wasn’t as bad as they first reported”
I have no way to understand what the author of this graph was trying to convey. Would be nice if OP spelled it out or found a more “dataisbeautiful” way of representing the data.
hot part of Spain
for those reading this later, please dont downvote, this was still the case just up and till 2025.
TeenyTiny™
Well there are non-snarky comments available too that echo the same sentiment.
Also, your somehow even more snarky self-imploding mathematicalism is somehow saying the opposite of what you’re intending to say.
Yes, in an unexpected inception level of irony, this community is about as echo chambery as talking to chatgpt about a solution you found to a nonexistent problem.
Say you don’t like ai, get upvotes, say anything dissenting - even if it is the truth - and the entire community mimics the same sycophantic training of the very ai models they are against.
We need a new community called ai_critics or ai_sceptics, as the fuck in the current name is taken to a schoolyard level of irony here.
Eta: the comment with the reasonable explanation got burried https://lemmy.world/comment/19262976
Kinda makes me wonder if the current ambassador has been having a secret affair with a member of the royal family…
I posted on this a while ago. Doesn’t just apply to Signal, but all “encrypted” messaging apps.
Also interesting comments
Rules for thee
Tldr, mastodon guy rambles on about society getting more complex by using a 240 char limit platform to post an essay.
TeenyTiny™
Pretty good read on the Speaker’s bizarre comment
My best guess is that Johnson said this because Epstein was right and Trump did rat him out to the authorities. But as we said, this is not a good story for Trump, so why say it? Again, the best explanation is that it’s in those files the DOJ is sitting on. The White House fears it’s going to come out and so they’re putting the best spin on it they can. Trump was a real life Bruce Wayne type richie, wheeling and dealing by day, helping the authorities take down bad guys in the shadows. With Trump’s most ardent supporters, they might get some traction with that. But again, as noted above, it’s actually super damning.
The events in the video really happened in the last 24h I’m afraid.
Shame Lee Harvey Oswald isn’t around to use that magical turning bullet he used on JFK.
Don’t post paywalled articles without archive links pls
See my other comments in the other thread
While a significant portion of the GOP voted for the felon, there is serious mounting evidence that he wasn’t actually elected the second time around.
The key problem seems to be that both the Democratic Party and the American population rather is willing to accept that the climate emergency is real and they contributed a lot to it, rather than their black box computer based voting system has been compromised.
I get downvoted everywhere for this, but repeating the line that the republicans voted this guy in, is inherently voicing acceptance of the election results.
Remember that the 4 years of “the election was stolen” on non stop, was partly designed to make you look like an idiot if you were to say it now.
If it talks like a coup, smells like a coup, looks like a coup and acts like a coup, it probably is.
https://smartelections.us/2024-election-update
https://electiontruthalliance.org/2024-us-integrity-concerns/
My full ramble about this here:
https://lemmy.world/post/27126084