thorium is nuclear too… (and doesnt seem to have the same runaway problems!)

oh no!! criticism! shoulda just grabbed her by the pussy instead. when you’re famous they just let you and then its ok apparently.

/s obvs

which rule in particular?

how so?

i didnt see any other post so its good for me… pretty strong reaction when you could’ve just scrolled on by… hope you’re ok.

and yet, we adapt and we learn…

lets just hold the line of “the answer is always username/password + second factor”.

could be username/password + totp…

could be username/password + passkey…

if someone figures out my password, i dont lose everything…

if someone steals my passkey, i dont lose everything…

even if i do use the same password for everything, the second factor has it covered.

(nobody will ever guess my password of ******** anyway!)

no. just… no.

(fuck)

please stop fucking with the delicate balance of nature, its the only nature i’ve found that works for me

looks like it was moved outside the environment.

and also, using “correct path” instead of “right path” will be less confuzzling because english words can have multiple meanings and are the dumb.

nope

this is so awesome, thanks for linking!

sure, totally ok to incorporate those video items & publish your (signed) story. i think we’ve seen pretty clesrly that people want to publish and be recognised for their publications. building a web of trust has to start somewhere. currently we’re in the “its all very difficult, we cant solve all the tricky things, so we’re not even trying” stage. hopefully we find a way to move forward, even if its not perfect.

i think the point is to be able to say “this video was released by X, and X signed it so they must have released it, and you can validate that yourself”. it means if you see a logo that shows CNN, and its signed by CNN, then you know for sure that CNN released it. As a news organisation they should have their own due diligence about sources etc, but they can at least be held to account at that point. versus random ai generated video with a fake logo and fake attribution that is going viral and not being able to be discredited in time before it becomes truth.

maybe? was just trying to provide specific alternatives with a concrete example

… so make the phones do it?

i mean, its not rocket surgery.

so try again? also: if a pixel changes then it isn’t the original source video, by definition. being able to determine that it has been altered is entirely the point.

videos need to be cryptographically signed and able to be verified. all news outlets should do this.

nope.