• 25 Posts
  • 609 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 24th, 2023

help-circle

  • It was you talking about fairness.

    No, it wasn’t, I didn’t mention fairness because that is not my point at all, my focus is moving away from ICE vehicles.

    prefer vehicles to be taxed according to their weight?

    As long as all safety system weight is removed from the calculation then maybe! We don’t want companies sacrificing safety for weight reduction.

    Also significant changes should only apply to new vehicles, so the rules don’t change retrospectively after people have already made significant financial decisions based on government policy.


  • Depends on what you are trying to achieve, we should be moving away from burning fuel, and this takes us a step back.

    Also the heavier EV argument is a bit weak, they are not much heavier, and wear and tear when the roads that have to cope with 30ton lorries?

    The road infrastructure needs to be maintained or we don’t get any deliveries, and the shops have no stock, it’s not just drivers that need the roads.


  • Sadly no, I don’t think the pay per mile model is the right way to fund our roads if we are still going to charge a large amount of road tax to everyone on top.

    But if they want to encourage EV adoption and had no better ideas, they should have introduced a blanket 1p per mile for everyone.

    People who bought an electric car on a tight budget and drive 12k a year have been hit with an extra £560 in costs per year in the last 8 months.


  • In order to introduce this they needed to apply it to both ICE and EVs equally, to keep the transition to EVs going.

    This just encourages people to choose ICE and Hybrid over EVs. If you’re paying public charging prices at a very average 3m/kWh you’re paying 28p per mile. Compared with 13.5p per mile for the average petrol car.

    This is making any transition to EVs uncompetitive.