It’s just less hyped now compared to days of reddit API change and Twitter going to Elon Musk.

Still waiting for an Arabic lemmy 😔

It seems it does, but when I tried it it didn’t work very well. I don’t remember why, but it wasn’t exactly what I hoped.

Where? Please show me as I’d rather contribute to or fork existing projects

Friendica does

Email is a great addition, I didn’t consider that one. Thanks for that!

I’d love to add reddit and other big social medias even, but their restrictive access policies aren’t very promising.

Typically Arabs would be very impressed to see you even try to speak Arabic. I have never seen someone make fun of a foreigner for their accent. It’s also quite rare for a foreigner to speak without accent.

This victim mentality won’t take you anywhere and you’ll never make it in life with this thinking. Man up and make a coherent argument. No one will give you the sympathy you are seeking when you keep playing victim.

This seems reasonable, but then at what point do we say “no” to making dedicated spaces because someone thought their rights are being infringed?

Separate spaces for smoking are common. What about dedicated spaces where street music performers can perform and others where they can’t?

What if someone doesn’t want to see tattoos? At what point do you say “your annoyance is unreasonable”? I mean surely this one is, but is there a guideline that separates this from playing loud music?

A extreme case would be someone who wishes to make a space free of a certain race. Obviously this is ridiculous and bad, but I am seeking a guideline that can separate these unreasonable ones from the reasonable ones.

If you can’t handle disagreement you don’t belong here. I’m the only one who was willing to give you benefit of the doubt, no one else had given you their time of day. So delete your post if you can’t handle disagreement.

Why did you say you won’t argue then proceed to ask questions? Make up your mind.

Who said that? Form coalitions with whom?

If you mean “those opposing genocide in Palestine refuse to form a coalition with supporters do genocide” then I don’t see the issue.

You cannot call that “concede political power” when they never had it in the first place. If they did, they’d stop the genocide.

But some of these “rights” do contradict each other.

For example, it may be reasonable to say “I want the freedom to walk through my city downtown without having to smell strong weed”, but at the same time it is just as reasonable to say “I want the freedom to smoke weed in my city downtown”. Those two rights conflict. They limit each other. You can’t have both without restrictions. Which one would you have?

Smoking weed is just an example. You can replace it with “dressing provocatively” or even “dressing entirely naked” or it could be “playing loud unpleasant music in a popular street”.

Each of those “restrict the right of others” but so does the reverse. Which right or freedom are we picking?

Not sure I understand your question. Down votes seem to indicate others are the same. What do you mean by “concede all political power” and who suggested that?

Who split?

Is this an alternative to bitwarden and keepass? Is it better in terms of security?

For the mid Atlantic area there’s “hiking upward”, it’s pretty awesome.

That’s actually what I use as well currently. It doesn’t replace all trails completely but it’s something

Can you clarify what you mean by Chromecast support? I have a Chromecast device and it has the jellyfin app on it. Works like a charm without issues. I have a feeling you mean something else though?

He most likely isn’t the one who did it. The eyebrows from his suspect photo are way off.

They likely wanted to charge someone so the public doesn’t get ideas about doing a similar thing and not getting caught.

I agree, but we don’t have to convince anyone. A large minority would still be a huge achievement. In fact we don’t even need more than that.