For propulsion, a small steam engine can work. And it doesnt need much power, so even an earlier crude engine would suffice. And if you have a boiler for the steam engine, you can use it’s heat to heat air for a balloon. Now in reality a steam airship would require a very large boiler and balloon, and certainly would not be able to carry much fuel to go far. But it’s atleast within plausiblity to allow bending to allow for gameplay. Just like you can ride elk… sure you could but in reality they’d make for a terrible mount. But its a cool thing for gameplay.

I dont think “uncompromising” means that they want to force brutal realism onto players.

Vintage Story offers multiple playstyles and a huge amount of customization options when you create a new game world. You have the power to choose a creative experience, a peaceful world, balanced survival, hardcore wilderness survival or quite literally anything inbetween.

Sounds like the devs want to give players the ability to play the game however they want to play. So i think its perfectly fine to give my criticism. Im not saying what they have created is bad, i am just sharing what i think could make the game better for me and others. Honestly, vintage story provides a lot of what I wanted minecraft to become. But it just needs something to reduce the tediousness of gathering resources. Perhaps even something as simple as an airship that travels faster than you on the ground so distances aren’t big of an issue.

I think my first map was very unlucky, it was granite for tens of thousands blocks from my base. I dont think I ever found any sedimentary rock until I found a tiny limestone island (that was litterally the name of the biome iirc)… I get they are attempting to model real world, which is cool, I do like that aspect. The problem is the geographic biomes are insanely large. I think if the geographic biomes were the scale of minecraft biomes would make the game way more enjoyable to play without giving up too much of realism. There has to be a balance of realism to gameplay. I dont think theres many people in the real world that wants to walk to greece to find marble and then to the isle of portland to find limestone and carry it back to moscow.

Then maybe… stay out of it, cut all resources to them, and let them go at it.

Something to consider is shrapnel.

The next map generated, limestone was litterally everywhere. What i want is more control with the resource generation. I dont want to explore a million blocks to find a biome that may contain a metal.

And for the record, i wasnt looking for limestone for mortar… it was for leather to make a backpack. I think its also needed for iron (or is that borax?) Idk, i never got into iron because just finding enough resources to even mine iron is just beyond tedious as a single player.

So wheres the conspiracy theorists now?

Also why is he refering him as ‘Donald’?

What do you expect when you use an advertisement company’s software? You are the product.

My biggest complaint is resources is far to scarce. My first map i had to abandon because it took me litterally 4 hours walking to find the nearest limestone. The scarcness would be ok for large servers that can support a trade economy. But in a single player world, all the resources needs to available within atleast 1k blocks of any single point. Minecraft solves this be distributing most of the resources within a chunk and only change their distribution based on their depth.

Where I grew up, the well water was poisoned by a chemical dump in the 70’s. The public water system that was to replace the wells, draws their water just down stream of said dumpsite and downstream of a nuclear processing plant that dumps heavy radioactive metals into the river.

Guess its my fault for contributing to global pollution by buying bottled water shipped dozens of miles away.

Anything is possible with enough zipties.

Some executive read that millennials wanted to eat the rich and had the brillant idea.

The B52 payload capacity is 70,000lbs. The GBU-57 is 30,000 lbs. So B52 can easily carry two. (After all, the b52 was built to carry nukes half way around the globe). They arent configured to carry it simply because its a slow, big target.

while big AI models are REALLY power hungry. Mi****oft restarted whole nuclear power plant to manage energy demand.

Training models is very enegry hungry. But using models can be ran on consumer graphics card. I suppose you can argue to include the training cost to using models, but the models are going to be trained rather you use them or not, so the point is just moot.

The B52 can carry it. But the trick is being able to carry it and not get shot down.

Impossible. I was told trump is anti war and was going to bring peace to the world.

No, their name refers to the literal televison on their bellys

I mean, if dogs get their own specie classification from their ancestor. Sure why not horses.

https://i.imgflip.com/9y0t4g.jpg