this law covers the fediverse. aussie.zone now has a verification process
i agree with the above commenter: something should be done, but this is the wrong way to do it… it creates problems and effectively solves none
real vibes of
The laws of mathematics are very commendable, but the only law that applies in Australia is the law of Australia.
- Malcom (cunt) Turnbull - a conservative ex-PM
well then if it’s hurting the right people
i think their reasoning for the change also was that it’s easier to read for certain people with disabilities
… so that’s where they get the DEI part from
… but… wasteful? what the actual fuck
don’t you know the tariffs aren’t working because of the ACTIVIST JUDGES?!
don’t you know that CRIMINAL IMMIGRANTS are cheating the system?
don’t you know that RADICAL DEMOCRATS are needlessly non-compliant with ICE and THATS why it’s not all sunshine and rainbows?
don’t you know that CANADA is to blame for the lack of tourism?
i completely agree, i just don’t think that particular line of reasoning (not taking into account anonymous sites) proves that
if they wanted to do it properly, they’d have a system that integrates with mygovid that sites can integrate with via some oauth-like flow (login with facebook, login with google, etc: but verify with mygov), and the only thing the site gets back is a “yes over 16”
the government has this data; there’s no reason anyone else should see it
of course that’s also assuming the whole concept is a good idea, which is absolutely not… it’s wallpapering over a massive problem whilst solving absolutely nothing and causing issues
i agree that it’s not about protecting kids - is it ever? - but i also think that IF this were something conducted in good faith (it’s not), then the process would be pretty similar: gated access is the easy fix, so you work that out first (like a minimum viable product), and then work on the harder parts later
the american economy is huge not because it’s special… the american economy is huge because it has a default position, and it has that because it was friendly for collaboration: america is what it is because the rest of the world has settled on it being what it is
what’s the bet the netflix deal will be blocked by the SEC and then this one goes through for way less money because it’s clear anything else will be blocked
the vuln afaik is for remote code execution via basically a mechanism that’s kinda like a transparent RPC to the server (think like you just write frontend code with like a “getUsers” and it just automatically retrieves and deserializes the results so you can render the UI without worrying about how that data exists in the browser)
i’m not a front end engineer, and haven’t used react server components, but i am a principal software engineer, i do react for personal projects, and have written react professionally
i can’t think of a way it’d be exploitable via purely client-side means
i THINK what they mean is that you can use some of the RSC stuff without the RPC-style interfaces, and in that case they say the server component is still vulnerable, but you still need react things running on your server
a huge majority of react code is client-side only, with server-side code written in other languages/frameworks and interfaces with something like REST or GraphQL (or even RPC of course)
it looks like this only applies react server components, and it doesn’t look like element uses react server components
but i only had a quick skim; could be wrong, but personally i wouldn’t shut it down - not that im running a server myself
this is not something i’ve ever encountered, nor something that i’d ever expect from an LLM specifically… some kind of test-writing-specific AI? sure because its metric is just getting the thing to go green… but LLMs don’t really care about the test going green: they simply care about filling in the blanks, so its “goal” would never include simply making the test pass, and its training data has significantly more complete tests than placeholders
in the same way that engineering disciplines often provide priority to women because it’s hard af for them in the discipline not for any good reason but just because the industry is misogynistic af
being a women and a gamer is far more toxic than being a man and a gamer, and that drives away a lot of women who may have been the best, and men don’t have that same hindrance just by virtue of their gender
id argue too that anyone claiming to be trans probably has similar levels of toxicity, and therefor it shouldn’t be an issue: if the division is about encouraging diversity to combat toxicity, who cares if that toxicity comes from transphobia or misogyny
most things scale if you throw enough resources at them. we generally say that things don’t scale if the majority case doesn’t scale… it costs far fewer resources to scale with multiple repos that it does to scale a monorepo, thus monorepo doesn’t scale: i’d argue even the google case proves that… they’ve already sunk so much into dev tooling to make it work… it might be beneficial to the culture (in that they like engineers to work across the entire google codebase), but it’s not a decision made because it scales: scale is an impediment
it’s not tankie to have critiques of america
it’s tankie to deny legitimate criticism of regimes whilst also leveling similar critique at simply “enemys of”, or doing a what-about-ism in order to redirect discussion away from said criticism
that’s not relevant though… in a situation where you only need 1, you only need 1
and the statement had nothing to do with individual officers, so you can’t apply it to individual officers: the group that is US police officers frequently escalate situations… individual interactions are irrelevant to that statement
no real consideration? what do you meeeeeean american exceptionalism
you can’t apply group behaviour to single events… it takes time to change human behaviour in a group - especially when it’s politicised behaviour … if every restaurant were serving raw patties and raw was incorrectly politicised as “healthier” and then 50% started being cooked you’d say that’s progress… it’d remain horrible, but it is indeed progress and clearly those doing better should be congratulated for somehow managing to get their shit together even a little bit
generalisations shouldn’t be applied to individuals but often hold true for groups… a non-trivial number of US police officers escalate situations if they aren’t given “respect” and compliance. that is a fact… when applied to a decent period of time, over a city full of US police officers, escalation is all but inevitable: not for any individual, but the group
or fixing windows by only using WSL and reading the arch wiki
huh i swear the republicans were all about… what was it… states… lefts? privileges?… hmmm… can’t be states rights: that would be hypocritical as fuck