zkfcfbzr

  • 34 Posts
  • 626 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle


  • Using they/them by default is already a good start - I would be surprised to learn if neopronouns are a thing at all in languages that don’t have gendered pronouns to begin with. they/them is perfectly acceptable to 99+% of people - both cis and LGBT+.

    You can just say LGBT or LGBT+. Lots of others are in use but very, very few people will legitimately get mad at you for picking one over any other.

    If someone specifically tells you to call them a certain thing, you should call them that thing. Otherwise just stick to they/them.

    If someone tells you their sexuality and it is not relevant to you, you have no obligation to ever bring it up again, just as with any form of oversharing.

    And as for why some people share these things even though you may personally find it too revealing - that’s just down to personal preference. Different things are important to different people in different ways. Some people might go through their life never giving their gender a single thought. Others might base their life around affirming and fighting for it in various ways. Most people are somewhere in the middle. Everyone has a cause they believe in a lot - for some people, this is that cause. As an “Aero Ace” (a term I had to look up - “aromantic asexual” for those who also haven’t encountered it), you’re probably pretty predisposed to not care about any of this stuff on any significant level.




  • No, mostly because I’m against laws which are literally impossible to enforce. And it’ll become exponentially harder to enforce as the years pass on.

    I think a lot of people will get annoyed at this comparison, but I see a lot of similarity between the attitudes of the “AI slop” people and the “We can always tell” anti-trans people, in the sense that I’ve seen so many people from the first group accuse legitimate human works of being AI-created (and obviously we’ve all seen how often people from the second group have accused AFAB women of being trans). And just as those anti-trans people actually can’t tell for a huge number of well-passing trans people, there’s a lot of AI-created works out there that are absolutely passing for human-created works in mass, without giving off any obvious “slop” signs. Real people will get (and are getting) swept-up and hurt in this anti-AI reactionary phase.

    I think AI has a lot of legitimately decent uses, and I think it has a lot of stupid-as-shit uses. And the stupid-as-shit uses may be in the lead for the moment. But mandating tagging AI-generated content would just be ineffective and reactionary. I do think it should be regulated in other, more useful ways.






  • zkfcfbzrtoMicroblog MemesA mirror into another life
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    gen z: Roughly the generation currently in their teens to twenties.

    dommes - Sexual dominants, as opposed to subs. Specifically female in this case, with “doms” being the masculine/gender-neutral variant.

    puppygirls - Dog equivalent of a catgirl. A girl who takes on visual and personality traits of a puppy to various extents, often as a form of sexual play.

    dogcage - Where you put your puppygirl when she’s been chewing on the remote or peeing on the rug.

    rawdog - To experience something “raw”, without any aides to make the experience safer or more tolerable.

    Translation: It’s incredulous that young sexual dominants allow their submissives to use their phones while in their cage. It lessens the experience!





  • zkfcfbzrto2meirl4meirl2meirl4irl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Bold to assume I care about preserving my circadian rhythm

    There isn’t a single hour of the day I haven’t both fallen asleep during and woken up during at least once in the last three months




  • zkfcfbzrtoScience Memes@mander.xyzDo you know the answer?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It is 33% if the answer itself is randomly chosen from 25%, 50%, and 60%. Then you have:

    If the answer is 25%: A 1/2 chance of guessing right

    If the answer is 50%: A 1/4 chance of guessing right

    If the answer is 60%: A 1/4 chance of guessing right

    And 1/3*1/2 + 1/3*1/4 + 1/3*1/4 = 1/3, or 33.333…% chance

    If the answer is randomly chosen from A, B, C, and D (With A or D being picked meaning D or A are also good, so 25% has a 50% chance of being the answer) then your probability of being right changes to 37.5%.

    This would hold up if the question were less purposely obtuse, like asking “What would be the probability of answering the following question correctly if guessing from A, B, C and D randomly, if its answer were also chosen from A, B, C and D at random?”, with the choices being something like “A: A or D, B: B, C: C, D: A or D”