• criitz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      87
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Yeah they were still Europeans when they named them. This should be the Obama award meme

      • lugal@lemmy.ml
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 years ago

        They were. The American identity came later. Until the war of independence, settlers identified with the European countries of their heritage

          • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s weird. Someone once told me her husband was German after I mentioned I lived there for a while. So I asked where they’re from, maybe I knew. “From Mississippi…”

          • lugal@lemmy.ml
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I don’t live in America but I think most would consider themselves Americans. They are proud of the flag and the constitution and stuff. In the 1600s, you wouldn’t have figured a white person when someone said “American”. The whites were Brits or Germans or French, but not American. The natives were Americans.

            • criitz@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Americans consider themselves Americans, but especially in the early days of the melting pot, cultural identity, and specifically that heritage was important. That’s why Americans are always saying they are Irish or Italian or whatever. The actual people from those countries laugh or get defensive about Americans who have never left the US claiming that heritage, but there’s a reason behind it.

            • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 years ago

              In america we refer to our families by their heritage. Italian American. Irish American. Etc.

              • Che Banana@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 years ago

                this statement sums it up nicely. Anecdotally, when I lived in Buenos Aires, every single person was "second generation " Italian…lol

              • lugal@lemmy.ml
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                2 years ago

                Italian American. Irish American. Etc.

                My point exactly. They aren’t Italians who happen to live in America but Americans with Italian heritage. And I’m not talking about first or second generation but like “white” people in general. The concept of whiteness exists since they started to be Americans.

                • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  I’m not really sure what you’re saying. There were no white people before the USA?

      • kemsat
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        They still are. Note how the USA helps Ukraine, primarily white country, but not so much countries that are primarily brown people.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          They don’t help Ukraine because white.

          They help Ukraine because fuck Russia.

          See also Afghanistan (70s and 80s edition, not the remake)

  • Pickle_Jr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Meanwhile, the Americans that didn’t even put “new” in front of the city name and just called it Paris, Texas or some shit.

  • TheControlled
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 years ago

    I mean, it’s a bunch of immigrants naming things after their home. Or it’s a bunch colonists claiming things… For their home.

    • Shapillon
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      Or Villefranche which means it was exempted from taxes.

      Or how there are so many “St Something” that they had to add “de somewhere” to disambiguate lmao.

      I’ve lived in 3 different places all named St Etienne.

  • son_named_bort
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 years ago

    And then there’s the Amish, who gave their towns names like Intercourse and Bird in Hand.

      • Soku
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Just googled quickly out of interest. There’s 14 pubs called Bird in Hand within 30 miles from my location, plus 2 restaurants and one bus stop with the same name.

          • Soku
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            There’s a pub 0.3 miles from the bus stop. I suppose better than to name the stop “Nisa local” or “shopnumber5”.

  • diverging@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 years ago

    People have always had a lack of creativity.

    When the Greeks were settling around the Mediterranean they founded many ‘New Cities’, (Neapolis). One remained a ‘new city’ for long enough for the name to evolve to Naples.

    The Phoenicians did the same, in their language ‘New City’ was Qart Hadasht, we now call it Carthage. One of the Carthages in what is now Spain was conquered by Rome and to differentiate it from the Capital of the Carthaginians they called it Carthago Nova, essentially New New City.

  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Uhhh, buddy? Most of those were Europeans born in “city name” who moved and founded “new city name” because they were born in “city name.” This is a you thing.

  • RagingRobot
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s weird they went with new instead of better. Maybe they weren’t very optimistic.

        • bizarrocullen
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Fun fact: Britain was called great to differentiate it from ‘little’ or ‘lesser’ Britain, with theories go between Ireland and Brittany

    • Pipoca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Sometimes in colonial America, people named things in honor a Duke who funded/controlled the place.

      For example, after NY was captured from the Dutch, it was a proprietary colony of the Duke of York.

      Better York sounds like it’s just antagonistic towards the guy.

    • Exslash
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I literally just used new prague as an example to my fiance over Christmas, about how we are super unoriginal in naming places in this country. Also hello fellow Minnesotan.

  • Smoogs
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Tbf a lot of the ‘new[city]’ was given their names by the British empire expanding their land. Just look at Australian state names… The Americans doing this in more recent times are simply following suit.