• Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    2 years ago

    Stapleton said she now relies more on filtered water at her home in New Jersey.

    But study co-author Beizhan Yan, a Columbia environmental chemist who increased his tap water usage, pointed out that filters themselves can be a problem by introducing plastics.

    “There’s just no win,” Stapleton said.

    Oh, man.

    • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I’ve been saying this to people for a long time. Here in my country, most water filters are based on charcoal and a final filtering element. That element used to be made of cellulose and other organic materials, but in the last decade, they started coming with that element made of polypropylene, until all the cellulose ones disappeared from the market. Just imagine your water passing though a porous layer of plastic, like a rigid sponge… this is a serious microplastic source.

      • ripcord@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        You’re talking like .01% as much plastic use per liter as plastic bottle water packs. Is that not…much much better?

        • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’m not sure how much microplastics are released in that way. It can be better than bottles, but if we used non plastic materials for so long, and it worked fine, I see no reason to put plastic in there.

          • ripcord@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s like it in that this is true, but there’s a big, big, big difference in how big a deal a given amount being in our systems is.

  • mouserat@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    ”The International Bottled Water Association said in a statement: “There currently is both a lack of standardised [measuring] methods and no scientific consensus on the potential health impacts of nano- and microplastic particles. Therefore, media reports about these particles in drinking water do nothing more than unnecessarily scare consumers.”

    Fuck capitalism - “no don’t be too cautious, just consume until we can finally prove what tiny particles accumulated in your organs can do. How bad can it be?”

    • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is the same attitude the US Food and Drug administration takes. A product can only be scrutinized if a new ingredient is proven to be harmful.

  • The_Mike_Drop
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    So plastic is made from oil, right? And oil is made from Dinosaurs. So we’re just surrounded by Dinosaurs. Even micro-Dino’s.

    Is this their revenge?

    • Coreidan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I guess. It seems like it doesn’t matter tho because it’s not just bottled water. It’s literally everything.

      All the food you eat. Anything you drink. The air you breathe. The clothes you wear. Literally everything you interact with has some amount of plastic that you’re consuming.

      You can put down the bottled water but the alternatives aren’t much better. Either way you’re being bombarded by microplastics.

      • cerulean_blue@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Oh, How I long for the olden days… I would literally die for a fresh glass of water plucked from a local stream. The copious amounts of lead and mercury combine with the rich abundance of feces, microbacteria and other organic matter, to create a pure, natural live giving elixir.

        Now all of that has been removed and replaced with modern plastic. No thanks

  • jagungal
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve seen a lot of reporting on finding microplastics in new places and new quantities, but is there reliable evidence that it actually does damage? Genuinely asking, can someone please send me the papers?

    • TammyTobacco@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think it’s still a bit early for us to know how it’s affecting us. It’s the kind of data that takes a lifetime of micro plastics to see how it will kill us. But knowing how much cancer various plastics already give us, it’s safe to assume this is a bad thing.

      • WhatAmLemmy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 years ago

        This isn’t like smoking or drinking. There isn’t any control group. We have no population to compare a lifetime of microplastic exposure against. It isn’t like lead, either. Plastics pollution to date guarantees a continuous supply of microplastics for decades/centuries.

        • NotSoCoolWhip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          You’re right, I assume that even at the very best, an uncontacted tribe would still be contaminated to some extent

  • Spitfire@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    Oh boy I sure do love plastic with my water.

    Realistically though, is there any way to really filter out these?

  • variants@possumpat.io
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    I wonder how the refillable plastic 5 gallons are with plastic, we need to go back when they were made of glass

    • Agent641
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Someone needs to invent soft glass that doesnt break so easily. Surely it cant be that hard.

      • Bocky@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s not too hard, but it’s more costly, and consumers want a cheap as possible.

      • saigot@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Borosilicate glass fits the ticket (what pyrex is made of) but is quite expensive.

      • Squizzy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Cartons of water exist but I guess they have a coating inside maybe?

  • BeMoreCareful
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Does this include like nalgenes and camelbacks and things of that nature?

  • Etterra
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Well I mean how awesome am I going to get plastic in my system? It’s not like that stuff just grows on trees.

  • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t care at all. You can take plastic from my cold dead hands hippies !

    First it was micro plastics, now it’s nano plastics, next they’re going to make number go up by counting individual plastic molecules.