• djsoren19@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    160
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 年前

    Good. This is the kinda shit Dems should keep doing. It doesn’t matter if it sounds petty, these assholes are a threat to our democracy, they should not be allowed to spew their lies without consequences. If the press refuses to do their job, it falls to whoever is closest to a Republican.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 年前

      Buttigieg should be front and center a lot. He’s whip smart, a great speaker, and really relatable

      • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 年前

        Yes. But I don’t think he’s a “dem” like the ones forcing Biden so trump wins. Therefor it’ll be him making his way with little help sadly.

    • cmbabul
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 年前

      Thank you, I’m so tired of this loyalty to decorum. Call them what they are, authoritarian regressives

    • Valmond
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 年前

      Step 1: sell the press to the rich

      Step 2: everything is shitty now, but why?

        • force
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 年前

          Do NOT use battery electric busses when you could use trolleybusses. Or even better, just use trams

          That being said, anything is better than diesel busses

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 年前

      For future readers, the quote in this comment is from GOP Representative Perry who was then immediately proven wrong by Buttigieg.

    • AdamEatsAss
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 年前

      Better yet pour the 20billion into reliabke regional and long distance rail infrastructure.

    • mojo_raisin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      1 年前

      EVs can’t save the environment. EVs are made from oil (tires, plastics), and the metals they are made from are extracted and shipped using huge machines also made from and burning oil.

      Switching from pumping oil to mining Lithium isn’t a net improvement to the environment.

      Any mode of transportation that is heavy and uses tires is going to be a major source of microplastics.

      It is not possible to expand into sustainability when it’s our massive scale that is at the core of our unsustainability. Degrowth is our only chance.

      • kevindqc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 年前

        I’ll take the lesser evil of local pollution over sending billions of tons of greenhouse gas into the atmosphere every year.

        I doubt degrowth will ever happen unless it’s caused by population collapse due to mass casualties.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 年前

          I think education alone curbs population growth towards negatives, and that policies can easily decrease population growth far into the negative, as many modern nations have illustrated. Mass casualties aren’t realistic or necessary.

        • mojo_raisin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 年前

          8 billion is unsustainable, our population will decrease drastically in the coming century. We can choose whether it’s via degrowth (a controlled, intentional, intelligent reversal of the economic growth of the last decades) or famine, disease, and war.

          I fear you’re right that degrowth will never happen and we’re just going to march toward collapse.

        • mojo_raisin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 年前

          Rail as part of degrowth is a great idea. Rail as part of expanded exploitation of natural resources is not.

      • guacupado
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 年前

        Switching from pumping oil to mining Lithium isn’t a net improvement to the environment.

        We did both before EVs were a thing.

  • RickRussell_CA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 年前

    I just wish Mr. Buttigieg wasn’t confined to such a low-stakes role in the administration. It’s great that he gets the occasional moments like this, but he’s not exactly being set up for a run at the Presidency in 2028.

    • The Assman@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 年前

      Dude’s only 42. He’s got plenty of time. Hell you can’t even get elected these days if you aren’t getting social security.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 年前

      I dunno if I’d consider Secratary of Transportation as a low stakes role, he’s been out and about getting IIJA funds out across the country and there to present new rail, highway, air and marine infrastructure improvements.

      Plus, if an unspeakable fate were to befall thirteen specific individuals, simultaneously rendering them unable to perform their duties, you’d have a President Buttigieg.

    • paf0
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 年前

      He needs to age into his vibe first.

    • UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 年前

      I just wish Mr. Buttigieg wasn’t confined to such a low-stakes role in the administration.

      Mr. Buttigieg is just a small bean from Indiana. If we want real leadership, we need to look to a more successful set of mayoral candidates. Like Michael Bloomberg or Lori Lightfoot.

  • ozoned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 年前

    A lot of GOP voters don’t really care about facts sadly. I’ve talked to some that insist Jan 6th wasn’t an issue.

    • SupraMario
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 年前

      A lot? Pretty much all of them. Look at how many lies trump said during the debate… they’ll lie directly to their base and their base isn’t even intelligent enough to question it.

        • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 年前

          Because they somehow think the lying will benefit them and not the people they hate.

          Predicting a republican’s reaction to any issue is easy because they are all grifters.

          • acetanilide
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 年前

            My family likes him because “at least you know what you’re getting”

            I don’t really think they understand how much shittier he can (and will) get.

  • LordCrom
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 年前

    All of these hearings serve no purpose other than to give Congress people 4 minutes of time to create some sound bites for the campaign.

    Questions are widely leading or very inaccurate or even just lies … If they ask a question at all. Some just spout garbage for a few minutes.

    • TurtleJoe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 年前

      Not always. Both Trump’s NY fraud conviction, and election interference (hush money) felonies came out of the Michael Cohen hearing, specifically from AOC questions.

      Your overall point is absolutely correct, though. It’s even more frustrating when it’s easy to see how powerful these hearings can be.

      • lemming741
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 年前

        Fishing for a guppy and caught a whale?

        • TurtleJoe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 年前

          I wouldn’t say so. She asked direct, pointed questions about how the Trump org had over valued properties and other assets in order to get more favorable loans. She knew exactly what she was doing during that hearing.

    • pyre
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 年前

      the bar is so low. did everyone forget who this guy is?

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 年前

        I shall never forget as long as I live. Katie Porter or AOC would be better choices.

        • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 年前

          He’s a milquetoast centrist moderate who will champion the same neoliberal policies that led us to this current state of crisis in America. He was also a proud McKinsey consultant and I think he worked with the CIA. During the election I thought his main issues were just not enough experience, though (he was just mayor of a small town basically). Social issue wise he’s better than Trump still. Anyone is, though lol.

    • jo3shmoo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 年前

      Agreed. Pete in the debate would have been a dramatically different situation. I’d happily watch him fact check all day long.

    • rsuri
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 年前

      We should start a campaign to write him in to force the Dems’ hand.

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 年前

      I like Pete but his name is a problem. It has the word butt in it, and is pronounced like “booty judge.”

      Great guy, unfortunate name.

    • paf0
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 年前

      Yes, it will be Newsom

      • EveryoneDiesAlone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 年前

        Whitmer or whitehouse woukd be better, but the way the DNC plays things, they would obviously choose the weakest candidate for no reason other than to not seem biased against their opposition. It’s fucked. The whole thing is fucked.

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 年前

          I think it’s a bit more nuanced than that. They’ll obviously choose the most neoliberal candidate they think they can get away with, and try to pass him (and it will be “him”) off as “progressive”

          • UnderpantsWeevil
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 年前

            If only there was some kind of formal method for identifying and vetting and selecting the party representatives, as part of - like - an election or something. I feel like if maybe we’d started back in January and had a bunch of debates between these people early on, we might be able to include ourselves in the discussion.

            Instead, I guess we’re just going to wishcast our favorite blue state governor into the White House, until the DNC Convension disabuses us of our delusions.

        • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 年前

          No. It’s because they are getting paid by the same people to seem like they care. They don’t and I am not saying both parties are the same I’m saying the same entity controls both party’s coffers. The oligarchs.

        • acetanilide
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 年前

          Not going to lie, I would probably vote for Whitehouse just so he can be Whitehouse in the White House 🤭

      • PlantDadManGuy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        1 年前

        That is probably the only dirtbag Democrat that could sway my vote from them to the Green party. Fuck Gavin Nuisance with a long rusty shovel.

        • paf0
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 年前

          I will vote for whatever candidate has the best chance of beating Donald Trump.

        • EveryoneDiesAlone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 年前

          Are you under the impression that the green party is a reliable place to put your vote? Do you believe that this is not a complete waste of your one singular vote?

          • Pheonixdown@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 年前

            They might be in one of the 35-40 states where their vote doesn’t matter anyway.

          • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 年前

            It’s not a waste if you vote. It’s a waste if you don’t vote. Screw your head back on.

          • fiercekitten@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            1 年前

            Stop trying to shame people who want to vote differently from you. It’s not an effective way to change someone’s mind and it’s anti-democratic.

            • Ledivin
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 年前

              Our voting system is undemocratic. Until that isn’t the case, I will keep trying to push people away from wasting their votes.

              • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 年前

                What? No! But we make such a big deal about spreading democracy. Say it ain’t so!

                In all seriousness I hope this election makes the rest of the US wake up to the fact that our democracy sucks, and we can stop being a hypocrite about destroying the way of life for other countries like Cuba because we don’t like there’s.

  • dohpaz42
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 年前

    I accept my anger and cynicism; I forgive myself for letting these people anger me. I try to “turn the other cheek” and simply be a better person than them. But…

    …the more i hear these people talk, the more I’d love to see something excruciatingly painful to happen to them.

  • AbidanYre
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 年前

    central planning model and this dictatorial policy

    Fuck you, Scott Perry.