renzev to linuxmemesEnglish · edit-21 year agoAverage systemd debateimagemessage-square124linkfedilinkarrow-up1813arrow-down138
arrow-up1775arrow-down1imageAverage systemd debaterenzev to linuxmemesEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square124linkfedilink
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-21 year agoWouldn’t your NFS not mount in that case? Wouldn’t you want it to retry periodically? Also, what happens to your service when NFS isn’t available? Sounds like systemd mounts are better in this case (unless the device is non critical)
minus-squareInverseParallaxlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoI mount it manually when I’m sure everything is up. The issue is, I use this workstation to bring up the rest of my network and servers if they’re down, can’t have a hard dependency on nfs if it’s job is to bring up nfs.
Wouldn’t your NFS not mount in that case? Wouldn’t you want it to retry periodically? Also, what happens to your service when NFS isn’t available?
Sounds like systemd mounts are better in this case (unless the device is non critical)
I mount it manually when I’m sure everything is up.
The issue is, I use this workstation to bring up the rest of my network and servers if they’re down, can’t have a hard dependency on nfs if it’s job is to bring up nfs.