• glowie@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Sad to think there will be real people who are fine with the privacy invasive spyware

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      4 months ago

      my ex fiance loved personalized ads because that’s how she found out about products she wanted and i was like… but you didn’t want it before you knew it existed. you were just living your life perfectly fine and now you’re $20 poorer

      • glowie@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Haha yup the amount of times I’ve tried to educate friends/family only to feel like banging my head against a brick wall would be more effective are far too many

      • candyman337@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s still the most widely used browser, even if it doesn’t individually effect you doesn’t mean it’s not bad

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        There’s also Chrome-derivatives and Chromium and whether those could excise the AI spyware and how deep that gets embedded into it.

  • Higgs boson@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    4 months ago

    Blip. Just like that, they are dead to me. I know our society has decided super invasive data collection for ads is okay… I’ve decided that is another part of the social contract we need to revisit. With prejudice.

  • TrackinDaKraken
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    4 months ago

    Never use Perplexity, got it.

    I’m old, I don’t browse the web on my phone, anyway.

    • BenLeMan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      And I used to recommend it to people over ChatGPT. 😭 Because it doesn’t require you to log in. Enshittification really is everywhere now.

    • kronisk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 months ago

      Srinivas believes that Perplexity’s browser users will be fine with such tracking because the ads should be more relevant to them.

      He’s so out of touch that he believes their users are going to be excited by this.

      “That’s kind of one of the other reasons we wanted to build a browser, is we want to get data even outside the app to better understand you,” Srinivas said. “Because some of the prompts that people do in these AIs is purely work-related. It’s not like that’s personal.”

      And work-related queries won’t help the AI company build an accurate-enough dossier.

      “On the other hand, what are the things you’re buying; which hotels are you going [to]; which restaurants are you going to; what are you spending time browsing, tells us so much more about you,” he explained.

      The personal integrity of others is a concept completely lost on this person, it seems.

      • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        The personal integrity of others is a concept completely lost on this person, it seems.

        If you have no integrity yourself, it’s hard to understand that others do.

    • uienia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      The message is aimed at his customers (ie. his advertisers), not for the potential users of the browser.

      • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Maybe he’s really drank the kool aid and ACTUALLY thinks people want ads and no privacy. Which then, as an investor, might actually be a giant red flag that he’s a complete imbecile.

      • dumblederp@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Obviously, but it’s still not something you want getting out. Like you’d tell your clients at a vendor dinner but wouldn’t put it in an email or video conference.

        • Higgs boson@dubvee.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          You are just mistaken about this. They have surveys showing 76% of people say they want personalized (“relevant”) ads. Companies think this is something almost everyone wants.

          • dumblederp@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Maybe I am wrong about this.

            Personally, I don’t want any ads, I’m broke I buy as little as I can get away with.

    • jecxjo@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      while I hate ads as much as everyone else what do you propose funds all the sites people use that are high in operating costs? I doubt many people will pay five bucks a month for every site they use. The internet will just be more retro, which I think would be fine.

      • I_Has_A_Hat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Brave had a novel solution, but I think it’s mostly dead now.

        • jecxjo@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          It was all ad based, just you could pay it forward to the site themselves. The problem was that this clean generate any money due to no click through and the target audience wasn’t marketable.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 months ago

    I presume this browser is going to have an install base of about 1? Depending on how many testers they have.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Fuck that guy sucking my time with his ads. If I want to buy a ladder I’ll go online, or go to the store and buy one. Once all this world ending shit dies down let’s get rid of “advertising” as an economic concept. We don’t need any more socio/economic engineering, we need humanity and ecology.

    • TrackinDaKraken
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ads after you buy a ladder: “Yes, you’ve had one ladder, but what about a second ladder?”

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      i think some form of advertising is useful no matter the structure of your society: if you have a cool idea for a new product, getting the word out is an important way of making it a reality

      what we don’t need is the constant, and ever-present repetitive drone of advertising mundane things that you already know about

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Nearly half of the country is dumb enough to support Trump. I think he is reading the room.