• Sunflier
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    My money is on Iran enacting a terrorist attack on July 4. It isn’t just Iran’s opportunity to enact mere vengeance, but it is a convenient opportunity to have that vengeance become deeply ingrained into the mind of America for a long time to come. Where we would once have celebrated out independence, that celebration would be contaminated by a horrific attack. It’s not just about enacting petty revenge, but it’d be about sending a message for generations. Also, the date is conveniently close.

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      31 minutes ago

      That would practically guarantee boots on the ground in Iran and a regime change in 3 months.

      Iran’s leaders are dumb, but I don’t think they’re that dumb.

      edit hate to repeat a standard antisemitic trope, but Israel would have a big reason to fake that

      • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 minutes ago

        Typifying a nation state by to it’s goals, rhetoric, and past actions is not antisemitic, but the government of Israel definitely wants you to conflate it as such.

      • Sunflier
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Maybe, but how brutal was it when we went into Afghanistan? Who did we attack when we invaded Afghanistan? Who runs that country now? For all that effort we put into getting rid of Al-Qaeda, they seem to still be running things. If I were a religious zealot, where I think my terrorism gets me into heaven, sending a message to the west in such a terrorist attack might be worth it. After all, the religious leader there is like 80-something, so he might not mind sacrificing the few years he has left for a guaranteed entry into heaven.

        The cynic in me is going to bet that the Trump administration already knows an attack is coming, and they will let it happen. It’s an easy reason to implement martial law. Then, with the ongoing emergency he’ll always somehow manage to have manifest when people try to get him to give up power, he’ll let the Iranians attack. Then, another emergency is declared.

        • vga@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          32 minutes ago

          I suppose the hit on Bin Laden couldn’t have been launched without significant presence in Afghanistan. Why you stayed there after that though was weird. That seems to have been Obama’s mistake.

  • Bieren
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This must be that winning MAGA talks about.

  • tym
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Fellow muricans; stay out of metropolitan areas on July 4th. My guess is that we’re going to see the inevitable marriage of military and local law enforcement using the “iranian sleeper sell agents biden let loose in our country” angle instead. Faux news frontpage is laying the groundwork as of yesterday.

    • remon@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      sleeper sell agents

      Damn, they must be really good at selling if they can do it in their sleep!

      • tym
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Lol… work brain seeped through. Pump those numbers up!

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Yeah, citizens and nuclear weapons research are perfectly equivalent targets.

  • Headofthebored
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Is Iran mad at me now? Bruh this is why I don’t like leaving the house. /s But seriously something has got to give with this maniac regime we have here in the U.S., and I’m afraid we are the only ones who could realistically stand up and change anything. Nobody else is coming to save us.

    • xiwi@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The maniac regime has been a maniac for literal decades at this point. Please do something about it, OK? Xoxo

    • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      We are the only ones who could realistically stand up and change anything. Nobody else is coming to save us.

      This is correct.

  • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Dear Iran, leave us Americans out of this fight. Your fight is with trump alone, we are hostages of him. Thank you for coming to my Ted talk

    • ssillyssadass
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      49 minutes ago

      Imagine a group of criminals holding a police station hostage. You are not the hostages, you are the ones who are supposed to take care of the hostage takers.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Live by the sword, die by the sword. We let Gazan children die because of who their parents voted for. I’m not saying two wrong make a right but that doing what is right starts with us.

      • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I know. I have always wished for Bernie to be president but nothing I tried (and I tried) was enought to get my boy elected, nor my local Democrat (I live in a red state unfortunately).

        • GreenKnight23
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          admitting it is cool and all, but would have been super awesome if you weren’t a huge pile of shit 8 months ago.

    • Tiger666@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      17 hours ago

      You voted(or didn’t) for him and are responsible. Good luck, leave the rest of the world out of this.

      Sincerely the world.

      • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Fuck you, don’t assume that shit on me. I voted, I volunteered on phone banks, I tried talking to whomever you listen on why this guy was a bad deal all the way back from 2015, and it was never for that walking piece of human excrement.

        • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Stand back, everyone. This guy made phone calls. I’m sure MAGA knows better than to show their face in this guy’s neighborhood!

        • Tiger666@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Did you vote against him? Did you read what I wrote? Then why so mad? Reading comprehension needs to increase in the US as well I see.

          Edit: you need to read and understand before commenting.

      • Surp
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Removed by mod

        • FabledAepitaph
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Yeah, fuck that guy. It’s not fault my a third if the country fell for the propaganda, and a third of the country didn’t care enough to even vote. I will not be held personally responsible for convincing all of the American voting populous to get their heads out of their asses.

            • FabledAepitaph
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Dumbass. I will never take responsibility for some shit I didn’t do. This is the same logic as racism, so get the fuck out of here with you bullshit

              • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 hours ago

                You’re doing a great job illustrating why it’s been so easy for the US to completely fuck up everything good it ever had going for it.

                • FabledAepitaph
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  Whatever bro. I’m doing everything I can without sacrifice my entire life to the meat grinder. The fact that you’re still free and not in prison is proof that you haven’t done anything more than I have, because all that’s left is the illegal shit.

          • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            15 hours ago

            It’s hard to blame the people who stayed home when disenfranchisement is an intended feature of your electoral system. The vast majority of people know for a fact that their vote mathematically does not matter and a huge number cannot get time off on the weekday it is scheduled for.

            If a full third of people stayed home, that’s a systemic problem, not an individual responsibility problem. Your electoral system is completely captured by capital and you are stuck blaming the electorate.

            Folks please: US corruption is not a cultural or personal issue, it is systemic. Power corrupts, not just people, but systems. The US has been at the head of the global hegemon for most of the last century, they have most of the billionaires, of course they are corrupt. That’s where capitalists focus their efforts to get the most returns. It’s not an accident that the guy doing DOGE just happened to be the richest man on the planet.

            Maybe focus your energy there instead of on the people who have literally no power.

            • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              If only there were some way that the people could kind of ha e their say and direct lawmakers th address some of these problems. The people need to choose some kind of representative that propose and pursue these changes. Imagine if you could just kind of “poll” the will of the people and add up everyone’s choices to choose a representative.

          • MrNobody@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Look, I get it. You are mad too, that trump is bringing you all down. However, this isn’t just a trump thing. This isn’t just a now thing. This is something that has been going on for decades, maybe even longer than most of us have been alive. The US is known for being arrogant, ignorant, prideful, and idiotic. Most non-americans have talked to americans online over the years and likely tried to explain what is wrong with their country, healthcare, pay, racism, nationalism etc. Most likely have been met with ‘hate us causee they aint us’, ‘better dead than red’. ‘USA USA USA’, or some other prideful bullshit.

            For decades you lot have all looked down on the rest of world, assuming you are doing the best, because you are born in the best country in the universe, raised the best way possible, pledging you allegiance to your flags, drinking up the nationalistic propaganda. For decades. And now, this trump shit has made the rest of the world say, nah fam we don’t like this. And you all have the gall to say. Its not us, dont blame us, we didn’t do it.

            Like shit. You guys made the bed, and have been making the bed for decades. Just because it’s been shat in now doesn’t mean you didn’t make it.

            Grow up, accept that, deal with it. Get your shit in order, fix it.

            Maybe then. In a few decades when the world can see you’ve fixed all systemic problems they might accept you again. Maybe.

  • considine@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Propaganda is when you punch someone in the face and then quote them saying “I’ll kill you” instead of mentioning the face punch.

  • ssillyssadass
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    And with how ICE is operating infiltration has become easier than ever.

    • Dasus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Mmm, not really.

      You can’t just slaughter civilians willy nilly. Well, you can, obviously, as shown by what’s going on in the world, but international laws say you shouldn’t.

      Iran could legally intern any Americans, but civilians wouldn’t still be POW’s. And should technically have rights and whatnot.

      • Derpenheim@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        International laws have said you shouldn’t since they were written, and not a single engagement has followed those laws. I disregard their existence as much as the people who enact war.

        • Dasus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          To disregard their existence is to pretend they don’t matter at all, which is incredibly naive.

          There’s no perfect compliance, no, but if they weren’t respected at all and had no effect, the situations would be different.

          For instance yeah, Russia has apparently brought out WWI style choking agents and used them. But there’s no widespread use at least, and no mustard gas. Which would be more effective for Russia to do. But they don’t, as they want to keep plausible deniability so that Europe doesn’t gain an actual reason to mount an offensive.

          So yeah, while you are right in that psychotic asshats don’t care about them, they are affected by them nonetheless.

          Basically ROE says that medics shouldn’t be shot, but my brother trained as a medic and one of the first things they’ve we’re unofficially taught was to hide their crosses on the battlefield, as Russians would literally aim at medics. (Finnish army.)

      • LifeInMultipleChoice
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        He also can’t. Proclamations of war are made by the legislature. (Congress). If the President sends troops in a supposed emergency they can go without legislative consent for 90 days and must be recalled at that time without the legislature’s approval. It’s stupid, because 90 days into a conflict we have troops on the ground and an immediate evacuation only hurts us economically and global appearance some worry about. Not to mention the troops lost/injured, casualties left with those attacked and Congress not agreeing to keep them there is an admission that it was wrong, so not paying restitution would hurt international relations as well.

        To me it comes to, if he orders troops on the ground, an immediate Congressional impeachment would be needed, and the Senate to remove him, or they will vote in favor of staying in the fight to “save face” and not care how many innocent lives die or are thrown into poverty, starve, are raped, wrongly imprisoned, tortured, and the damages it will cause to the mental health of a whole new generation of our soilders and people of other counties around the world.

        • KMAMURI
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          You’re speaking like you have a functional government.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            The funding comes from Congress… So either they approve it or are forced to approve it which they would have to recognize they no longer exist as an entity if the executive branch can write their checks for them.

            So to save face, they would have to approve or impeach. Or completely give up the guise that it is a Republic. Their votes are public record. So the executive branch could make them up, post them and threaten them not to say anything… but I doubt many of them would go through with that and not vote to impeach unless they are truly pro dictatorship. Some of them think they are pro dictatorship, but when you gather hundreds of people spending their lives/career trying to work their way up in power and someone says they are going to dissolve their positions/power and their chances of rising or having any say plummet… they would be powerless if they chose to follow… Greed and self preservation would make them not want it.

    • Zorque
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It used to be that non-combatants weren’t considered legitimate targets. Ain’t progress fun?

      • Anomalocaris@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        tell that to all the civilians in Guantanamo and Gaza.

        if the first aggressor doesn’t give a fuck about rule of war, it can’t complain about them

        • matlag@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          2 days ago

          Or Ukraine’s civilians. Or the 500k–2M dead civilians during the war against Iraq. Oh, sorry, those were “collateral”…

          Usually citizens are not considered fair targets. They’re just targeted all the same.

          Iran does not have the military capabilities to fight off Israel, let alone the USA. So they will most likely use terrorist attacks, targeting civilians, because that’s the best hope they have to end the war: when the people back home get serious about ending it as they’re taking losses.

          Unfortunately, and as usual, the very important people who decide to keep going or stop are also the least likely to see their life at risk. And in this case, they also happen to not give a flying fuck about civilians lives.

          • vga@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            So they will most likely use terrorist attacks, targeting civilians, because that’s the best hope they have to end the war: when the people back home get serious about ending it as they’re taking losses.

            Remember what happened the last time a major terrorist strike happened in USA? That’s the number one way to get ordinary civilians of a democracy to support an actual war almost 100%. It’s the kind of strategy that makes Pentagon say “yeah lol be my guest let’s see what happens”.

            • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              Remember what happened the last time a major terrorist strike happened in USA?

              The USA responded by attacking the wrong country under the false premise of "weapons of mass destruction "?

              • vga@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                22 hours ago

                The USA responded by attacking the wrong country

                Not just one! They got Osama bin Laden eventually though so amazing success

            • matlag@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Go explain that to Iran’s leaders. Good luck!

              On 9/11, the message sent was very unclear (“we hate you for your overall activity in the middle-east and the rest of the world” and/or “death to America”).

              This time, it may be very clear: “that’s retaliation for the unjustified bombing of our country” (though Iran had its share of chanting “death to America”, so yes, YMMV).

              I agree with you, you know: more deaths will lead to more retaliations, from both sides. Someone has to act like a true adult responsible pragmatic leader now. But there is none in power on either side.

        • Woht24
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Putin has been doing it for nearly 3 years now

      • flandish
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        i mean true honest war does not have rules like that. the reason “rules of war” exist is so corporations can keep a labor pool and capital operating with minimal effect to profit. (“Ain’t no war but class war.”)

        true honest realistic “war” is carpet bombs, famine, death, and capitulation.

        stop expecting “war” to involve rules, you’ll only be surprised in the end.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        In the history of the world, it has only been a very short window during the late 20th/ early 21 st century that civilians were not considered fair game in war, although they get slaughtered anyway. Even with civilians being off limits, as recently as WW2, Korea, Vietnam, and the Middle East, civilians have been targets either by design, by atrocity, or by proximity.

        If there’s a war, don’t think you’re getting off the hook just because you’re a civilian. During war, the old adage “If your not with us, you’re against us” becomes weaponized.

      • FlashMobOfOne
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Americans have only ever pretended to care about non-combatants when it’s convenient. President Obama even invented the term ‘enemy combatant’ so he could pretend his drone strikes were killing fewer civilians.

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            17 minutes ago

            It was under Bush to justify imprisoning civilians. Bush was all for direct war actions.

            Obama massively increased bombings and drone bombings to pull out combat troops and would do stuff like double tap weddings. To lower the number of civilian deaths, Obama declared any male of 14 to be, by definition, an enemy combatant.

            The person you responded to was correct.

            Your sense of history is correctish, but not detailed enough.

        • conicalscientist
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Why would you post such an obvious and easily verifiably false statement.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well, it used to be that they were too. Have you heard of all the cities in Europe that were effectively destroyed during WWII?

        It comes and goes, usually whenever it’s useful. It sucks, but war is horrible. If civilians don’t want to be targets they should pressure their governments to not be in them. Yes, sometimes it’s worth fighting, but sometimes it isn’t.

        • fishos
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          2 days ago

          “War is terrible”

          Wow, such a great take. You should be in charge. Any more deep insights?

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Lol. You’re following me around now to insult me? And you called me a neckbeard…

        • Zenith@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Americans are always about how we hate the government of a country but not the people, at least this American is and all the Americans I know are, I know it’s not literally universal. To say “I hate the Iranian government but not Iranian people” seems pretty reasonable if you hate the Iranian government but for them to turn around and basically say “well I consider all American entities, including completely powerless civilians free game” is fucked I’m no matter how you look at it. Like wtf more do you want from me? I vote against this, have for decades, I protest against this have been since W was in office, I donate money and energy to war torn countries, I’m absolutely against bombing any country why exactly am I considered fair game?? Fuck anyone who lumps entire countries of people into a single hive-mind that serves its leader, a fraudulent one no less

          • the_wiz@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Well, do yourself what you would expect other people in a rogue state to do. How many cries of “the Russians should overthrow the government!” were there?

            Or to bring in a parable: What would you have expected from the average German citizen in 1939?

            • seralth
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 minutes ago

              I would expect the avg German citizen in 1939 to be historically fucked with no options but bad ones!

        • FuckFascism
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Never said they did, but that doesn’t suddenly make it right now does it.

          • Ginny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            According to the British (during the Malayan Emergency) and Americans (during Operation Ranch Hand), indiscriminately starving enemy civilians by spraying Agent Orange everywhere was legal.

            In more recent history, we of course have Captain Drone Strike’s reign of terror against wedding parties and aid workers in Afghanistan.

            The only thing that’s changed since the Geneva conventions of 1949 is that when civilians are targeted, the rest of the world says “tut tut, that’s a war crime” before it proceeds not to do anything about it.*

            * Unless you’re from Africa or the Balkans, apparently.

            • FuckFascism
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              What does that have to do with civilians being legitimate targets in war?

              • Ginny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                It depends on your definition of “legitimate”, I suppose.

                My point is that the targeting of civilians is still and always has been common in war. It may now be de jure illegal but it is de facto not policed.

                • FuckFascism
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  The word legitimate has a pretty specific definition it’s not really something that can be reasonably debated.

    • Kirp123
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      85
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      More Americans died of Covid than in any war the US was involved since it became a country, yes including the Civil War. The highest death estimate for the Civil War puts it around 750 000 deaths while around 1 200 000 died due to Covid. Most Americans don’t really care about the deaths of their fellow countrymen since, you know, they elected him again.

      Fun Fact (I know it’s not that fun): The number of people that died of Covid approaches the total number of people that died in all conflicts the US was involved from 1775 to 2019: 1 300 000 war dead versus 1 200 000 Covid dead

      • Zachariah
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        there’s still time to get those numbers up

      • captainlezbian
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        By 2000 more Americans had died of AIDS than any war but the civil war. Though I will admit I was surprised we still didn’t care when it wasn’t just undesirables dying. Turns out we’re able to be ablist enough to declare anyone who dies of disease basically already dead beforehand

    • El_guapazo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 days ago

      Maybe they can blow up his hotels and golf courses. He’d actually care more.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Oh good. Americans will die.

      Trump will be fine.

      I dunno. Iran got caught by American intelligence trying to assassinate Trump not long ago, under Biden.

  • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    The headline is somewhat misleading. Iran said US personnel are legitimate targets (meaning those employed by the US government. Not all US citizens.

    Although if I were American I would not risk depending on the judgment of a random Iranian soldier.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      First sentence:

      Iran announced Sunday that any American civilian or military personnel in the region are now considered legitimate targets

      So yes, still not all Americans, but no, not just government employees, American civilians too.

      But I suspect non-military people will be arrested, not treated as military targets to be attacked or bombed.

      • BigPotato
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Based on that sentence, it even just says “in the region” so hardly “all” Americans

      • Zexks
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        After we’ve droned some of their people. I wouldn’t put money on that.

      • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Folks have tried a couple of times, unfortunately it never seems to sink in that it generally isn’t worth the trouble.

  • brown567@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    🎶 Everybody’s going to the party, have a real good time

    Dancing in the desert, blowing up the sunshine 🎶

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Politicians hide themselves away

        They only started the war

        Why should they go out to fight?

        They leave that role to the poor,

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 days ago

        While I don’t recommend believing them non-conditionally, Haaretz has generally been opposed to Netanyahu and hid actions, especially after he picked a fight with them earlier this year.

        • SulaymanF
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          Even the Israeli left parties (and Ha’aretz is on the left) supports war on Iran even if they were less supportive of the genocide in Gaza. They still have a bias.