Was with you until no home cooked meals. Takeaways cost more than I spend on food for a week and I can make better food.
Make it buy a kg of every flavour of sausage at the butchers and eat them all over the month and the challenge works out a lot cheaper and tastier.
That’s what makes it a challenge
Yeah but you’ll also be eating sausage for every meal of every day for that entire month.
It’s gonna fit right in with the alcohol
And?
This makes me think of a really neat business idea… DoorCook! Where your neighbor is your personal cook! You put in an order and a price range and any “neighbors” within the area can bid on the price.
We synergize our business by avoiding all those pesky regulations like food licenses and let your meal come directly from your loving neighbor.
Shouldn’t it be 500<?
It should be <500 or what they said. What they said is mathematically better but grammatically wonky, whereas what you said is 500 is less than steps per day.
Big number > small number < big number
I wasn’t interpreting the text as being part of the equation so I got a different result
deleted by creator
I’ve been training for this my whole life
Completed it
I think the steps are the only challenge. Just going to the bathroom accrudes 1000 steps sometimes
That’s called middle age. You’re on!
I wouldn’t last 24 hours.
Eating expensive. Buying alcohol. Delivery because of the low steps/day.
I’m too broke for this.
Though… Is a drop of alcohol sufficient? Is watching at porn for a second sufficient? Is running an idle game for 5h sufficient? Does cycling, crawling or a wheelchair count for steps?
no, that’s how you get around the limit
I did that one day. Does it count?
This is already my life, just more gaming
That doesn’t sound very healthy physically. But mentally? Yes!
Mentally healthy? Since we have 2 kids I rarely sleep 8 hours, 6 is the new norm, and it’s definitely not helping mentally. I still try to get 8K steps daily, doing 500 or less would make me even more miserable.
That’s the trick though, especially as you get older. The stuff that sounds like an awesome relaxing reset and will surely be nice at the time, is not always the activity that will actually leave you feeling better afterwards.
A frustrating example is being tired in the middle of the day on a weekend when I wanted to be productive in my hobbies & house work. If I take a nap, will that save me evening or ruin my evening?
There’s a lot of trial and error, since we’re all different.
If I get paid, fuck yeah I’m on it!
Sounds miserable no thanks.
- no, I prefer the sex
- no, I hate when I can’t fly freestyle
- yes
- no, not enough
- ok is easy, I have a dog
- doable
- not on this economy
they meant less than 500 steps a day
smh
Who writes it that way???
It’s read out “500 less than steps a day”
Favorite subject of them grammar not was.
500 greater than steps a day.
technically the symbol is parsed as “greater than”. So syntactically they are not wrong, but we are not accustomed to reading it like that
I think <500 steps a day is meant here.
500> steps and <500 steps means the exact same thing though.
Yes thank you. However the comment above seems to imply the opposite.
Yes, that part is right, above comment doesn’t know how to read ‘greater than’ symbols.
Yes that’s what they wrote in the OP
People don’t know how to use greater-than or less-than symbols
It’s correctly used in the text.
Number of steps < 500 is equivalent to 500 > number of steps.
I was thinking that. Seems to work to me, the wide end is the bigger number and 500 is more than your steps per day
It’s a bit weird, but imo not wrong. 500 > steps/day or steps/day < 500 is the same. As long as the big end of the < or > is at the 500 it makes sense. It only doesn’t make sense if you literally read 500 > steps/day as “five hundred greater than steps a day” instead of parsing it as math.
Only reason it’s so jarring is the context has people parsing the whole list as language and they weren’t expecting to have to abruptly parse a mathematical expression.
such as yourself you mean?
Nope, it’s wrong lol
If you read it aloud it doesn’t sound right, but from a mathematical perspective it’s saying the number of steps per day should be less than 500, which I think is the intention of the writer, no?
500 greater then steps per day
500 > steps_per_dayUnfortunately I don’t think we have enough information to solve for
steps_per_day, though I assume it is also= 0.So we can make an educated guess that
500 > steps_per_day >= 0Lmao
That’s if you interpret the text as being part of the equation
Yes that’s the intention but they got the order wrong, it would make more sense if it was written as ateps/day < 500
It’s so wrong it underflowed into somehow being right again.
Unusual? Sure. Mathematically? Right.
People don’t know how to use greater-than or less-than symbols
x>5 <=> 5>x 🤓
Can’t tell if an Excel enthusiast or a palindrome aficionado. 🤔
Yes
They where busy… walking?
