- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
We are witnessing a turning point in history. We are experiencing a crisis that goes beyond the economic level. We are facing a true crisis of civilization. The US, as an imperial power, is increasingly showing its decline, and in that decline, it acts irrationally, endangering all of humanity. It is not merely the fact that they have an “incoherent” and violent president, a racist and misogynistic sexual predator; Trump is not an anomaly. He is merely an extreme and bizarre manifestation of what the US has been since its founding.
The United States was founded by white slave-owning landowners, convinced of their racial superiority and exceptionalism, coupled with a deep-seated belief that they were destined to dominate the world (Manifest Destiny). A look at the recent National Security Strategy, published in November 2025, directly reveals this claim to superiority, which, in Trump’s case, takes on pathological traits.
Between 1776, the year of its independence, and 2019, the US carried out 392 military interventions, half of which took place after 1950 and 25% after the end of the Cold War. It is a fact that in the 250 years following its independence, the United States was not involved in a war for only 17 years. Since its inception, it has been a nation with imperial ambitions, which has made it a true power since the Anti-Fascist World War (the so-called Second World War according to Eurocentric historiography). Its imperial trajectory has evolved over time, and today we find ourselves at a moment when its power and society show clear signs of decline, and when new forces – capable of challenging that power – have emerged worldwide. Despite this (or perhaps because of it), its actions have become more dangerous and threatening.
One of those forces is, without a doubt, the People’s Republic of China, which was identified at the NATO Summit held in Madrid in 2022 as a threat to “the interests, security, and values” of whatever NATO represents.
The Declaration has the audacity to claim that China seeks to undermine the “rules-based international order”. A way of saying that China is challenging that international order based on NATO’s rules.
China was consolidated as a state in 221 BC under the reign of Emperor Qin, who succeeded in centralizing the state after two centuries of the so-called “Warring States period”. During his rule, Qin developed professional armies, organized the collection of taxes, had legal codes written, invented instruments for long-distance trade, and stabilized the mandarin bureaucracy. We could say that, during that period – more than 1,500 years before Latin-Germanic Europe – China had moved beyond feudalism. By that time, China had already developed a political thought and philosophy (the “Period of the Hundred Schools”) that would underpin, with variations, normative and ethical action in China for the next 30 centuries.
In classical Chinese philosophy, political wisdom is grounded in knowing how to wait, so that the “situation” may transform into an “opportunity”. This waiting is not, however, passive. It involves observing the “potential of the situation” and preparing for and accompanying the transformation (the path, the Tao) toward the opportunity. From the European perspective, Machiavelli said 20 centuries later that opportunity arises from fortune (chance), and it was the ruler’s skill to know how to take advantage of those opportunities. In Chinese philosophy, the opportunity arising from fortune is not lasting. It is fleeting. One must prepare for the opportunity. The ruler must therefore not fight opposing forces, but know how to use them to his advantage without denying them.
This brings us to the words spoken by President Xi Jinping during the centennial of the Chinese Communist Party. In his words, the president takes us from the party’s founding, the struggle for liberation, the Long March, the defeat of the Nationalists, the triumph of the revolution, the Cultural Revolution, the 1978 reforms, and the present day. A historical journey that reveals a path (Tao), a journey during which the transformation of the “situation” into an “opportunity” has been prepared.
In concrete terms, this opportunity has meant the eradication of critical or extreme poverty, officially declared in 2021. China lifted 850 million people out of extreme poverty. This achievement has resulted in a 70% reduction in extreme poverty worldwide. China has achieved economic development unparalleled in human history. The rate at which GDP, life expectancy, total consumption, and per-household consumption have increased, among other metrics, is on a unique scale. In 1978, only 1% of the world’s population lived in countries with a GDP lower than China’s. By 2012, that figure stood at 51%. These indicators can be reviewed in John Ross’s insightful book, China’s Great Road, published by 1804 Books. All of this translates not only into positive impacts for the Chinese people but also reinforces a vision centered on working to consolidate what President Xi has called a “community with a shared future”. This implies positive impacts on a global scale.
We see that the challenge China poses to NATO – and especially to the United States – goes beyond macroeconomic indicators or trade advantages.
It is a civilizational challenge. It is a different worldview. While President Xi Jinping speaks of building a community with a shared future, the Trump administration’s National Security Strategy emphasizes making the US the strongest, richest, most powerful, and most successful nation in the world. While China works to transform the situation into an opportunity, the United States acts impulsively, hoping that fortune will grant it the opportunity. That is why China invests in health, education, science, housing, and transportation, but the US invests in weapons and in maintaining a deadly military force capable of destroying the entire world. This makes the US a true threat to humanity. A nation of supremacists and superstitious people who promote a culture of death and possess a powerful army. An empire whose decline we are witnessing, whose end is beginning to loom, but an empire that dies fighting. Today, more than ever, anti-imperialism is a necessity and must be the common ground for all the struggles of the peoples of the world. The struggle today is anti-imperialist. For peace, for life, for humanity.
Guillermo R. Barreto is Venezuelan and holds a Ph.D. in Science (University of Oxford). Retired professor at Simón Bolívar University (Venezuela). He served as Deputy Minister of Science and Technology, President of the National Fund for Science and Technology, and Minister of Ecosocialism and Water (Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela). He is currently a researcher at the Tricontinental Institute for Social Research and a visiting fellow at the Center for the Study of Social Transformations-IVIC.
This article was produced by Globetrotter.
The post The United States of America: a threat to humanity appeared first on Peoples Dispatch.
From Peoples Dispatch via this RSS feed
FWIW,
New Rule: Losing to China | Real Time with Bill Maher (HBO)
He says that Americans are a silly people, the Chinese aren’t.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DH4v6FnbvM
6:12
6,182,676 views
Mar 12, 2021
I disagree. The Maga movement is the threat
Over the last 50 years, sanctions from the West, with well over 80% of the impact being US sanctions, have killed 38 million people. Mostly children, the elderly, and the sick.
Well before MAGA, the US committed multiple acts of genocide. They bombed Korea to the stone age. They defoliated forests to kill peasants in Vietnam. They dropped millions of tons of bombs in Laos and Cambodia.
Madeline Albright wasn’t MAGA. But when asked if she regretted the fact that the Iraq war killed 500k children she said she would do it again if she had to.
Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton oversaw the brutal destruction of Libya, turning it from the most prosperous country in Africa into an open-air slave market. When the partisan terrorists funded by the US captured Gaddafi, they sodomized him with a bayonet in the streets and filmed it. Hillary Clinton gloated saying “We came! We saw! He died!”
The US spread anti-vax propaganda in Southeast Asia to make people doubt the Chinese COVID vaccine, killing so many people in the process.
In Afghanistan the CIA recruited child soldiers, trained them, armed them, broke them, and directed them to rape, torture, and kill entire families all over Afghanistan.
The wars never stop. The sanctions never stop. The military never shrinks. The police force never shrinks. Both parties mange the baby shredding machine. Both parties are above international law and know it.
The US is the most violent, virulent, psychotic, genocidal, white supremacist, mass murdering, force on the planet and has been for at least 7 decades, though given the US genocide of indigenous peoples, and the eugenics boards, and the support for the Nazis, and the take over of The Phillipines, etc, it can be argued that it’s been much longer.
Edit: I forgot some
The US created the School of the Americas to train paramilitary. Many of those graduates went on to run death squad programs all over South America.
The US funded terrorists groups all over the world, but specifically the armed, trained, and led Mujahideen and eventually created what would become Al-Qaeda. The current leader of Syria, who the US had a bounty on for being part of ISIS? US officials have stated that he’s been working with the US for over 7 years. Meaning he was a known ally of the US while being a big figure in ISIS.
What else have I forgotten? There’s just so much American bloodletting to keep track of. It’s hard to remember it all
South America has entered the chat.
Central America has entered the chat.
Canada has entered the chat.
Cuba has entered the chat.
Puerto Rico has entered the chat.
…
Consider me ignorant. What does your comment mean?
No, the rich assholes controlling the U.S.A. are the threat. That makes the U.S.A. an evil empire.
Arguably rich American assholes did much to help make the PRC what it is today.
If Americans didn’t invest in, or buy from, the PRC, some other country would be the richest (or 2nd richest if the US is still the richest country) in the world.
Yes, but not because they intended to make the PRC successful. They intended to continue their self enrichment and China created a trap whereby the international bourgeoisie could enrich themselves by developing China’s productive forces. Just because the pirates had the money doesn’t mean they were the active agents in this process
IIUC, some Communist purists charged Deng with selling out, and presumably this applies to his successors.
I’m not so sure about the pirate analogy. IIUC, some pirates were egalitarian, at least more than the imperial navies, and if they were transported from the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries to the early 20th, some of them might have joined the Communists. I don’t know what you mean by “active agents”. I suppose they were pretty active in investing in the PRC and buying stuff from it. Maybe “unwitting agents” or “useful non-Communist agents” or maybe “frenemies”.
Lots of people say that the PRC is not truly Communist, notwithstanding the window-dressing. IIUC, wp:Lee Kuan Yew said something like Communism in China, at least pre-Deng, the degradation by Western colonial powers in the 19th century, and the atrocities by Imperial Japan, were anomalies; and today’s China is simply returning to its original position as the richest country in the world.
I’m not sure Deng’s goal was to create “a trap”. IIUC, the “international bourgeoisie” wanted cheap labor and perhaps fewer regulations, particularly with the environment, and some stability; and Deng wanted their capital. Also, presumably some capital for arms would help the PRC more in possible future headbutting with the Soviets, maybe Taiwan, and make the US think twice about war (such as Blowhard Trump not invading Kharg Island (as it could lead to something like the 1991 Kuwaiti oil fires and drastically increase oil prices, which could lead to the Democrats winning both Houses 215 days from now, and he (and perhaps Vance, Whiskey Pete, and much of the riff-raff that constitutes the rest of his Cabinet) gets impeached)).
Each side profited. The American rich and the PRC got richer, and while both are still dependent on each other, I suppose the American rich are more so. The interests of either are not necessarily my interests.
IIUC, some Communist purists charged Deng with selling out, and presumably this applies to his successors.
Correct.
I’m not so sure about the pirate analogy.
Sure. Ignore the pirate analogy. The capitalists of the West extracted substantial wealth from the rest of the world, including China, over a course of several centuries. That’s the point of that bad analogy I made.
I don’t know what you mean by “active agents”. I suppose they were pretty active in investing in the PRC and buying stuff from it. Maybe “unwitting agents” or “useful non-Communist agents” or maybe “frenemies”.
I mean they did not actively seek to develop China. As you say, China understood their motivations and took proactive action to create the conditions to exploit their motivations. The Western capitalists followed their profit incentive, so they were active in pursuing profit, but they were not actively pursuing the enrichment nor development of China and its people.
Lots of people say that the PRC is not truly Communist
They do, but then we have to get into the linguistics debate. The only correct understanding is that there are no communist states yet, as no one has achieved the economic organization of society of “to each according to their needs, from each according to their means”, nor has anyone abolished classes. However, we use the term Communist State not to mean “they have achieved communism” but rather to mean “they are led by a program that is directed towards establishing communism”.
today’s China is simply returning to its original position as the richest country in the world
Could be. It’s all conjecture.
I’m not sure Deng’s goal was to create “a trap”
Deng was pretty explicit that capitalists should serve the state, and he simply expanded that to include foreign capitalists. Foreign capitalists had no intention of serving the Communist Party of China, but he organized the economy so that they would, in fact, serve the CPC. And they did. If though they didn’t want to. Because their profit motive was stronger than their ideology.
Also, presumably some capital for arms would help the PRC more in possible future headbutting with the Soviets, maybe Taiwan, and make the US think twice about war
Wow. Just wow. The PRC lifts 800 million people out of abject poverty in 75 years and you think that the goal was getting some scratch to buy our build weapons? News flash. Deng left office in 1989, and that was the last year China engaged in warfare. Since 1989, China has not dropped a single bomb in conflict with anyone.
Each side profited. The American rich and the PRC got richer, and while both are still dependent on each other, I suppose the American rich are more so. The interests of either are not necessarily my interests.
This should tell you a lot. The American rich concentrated wealth and eviscerated the economics of their working class by closing factories and outsourcing everything. Meanwhile the PRC alleviated poverty, improved medical outcomes and life expectancy, and generally made the masses (3x the US population) way better off way faster than any other project in the history of humanity.
And of course the interests of China aren’t your interests, you’re a citizen of whatever country you’re a citizen of. Your interests are the demolition of your own national bourgeoisie and solidarity with the international working class.
Perhaps 40% of America is the threat.



