11·
14 hours agoUseless natterings.
fallaciousBasis
- 0 Posts
- 473 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
Cake day: January 3rd, 2026
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
1·14 hours agoSouth America has entered the chat.
Central America has entered the chat.
Canada has entered the chat.
Cuba has entered the chat.
Puerto Rico has entered the chat.
…
2·15 hours agoI think it’s time France come and update the statue of Liberty. Gotta remove that torch and move palm to face.
2·15 hours ago#facts
Holocaust denial? Oh please.
Dave Chappelle explains it pretty well. Whether you like his explanation or not…
Can’t understand it for you, though.
5·15 hours agoYou mean the original NES which they tried in court to stop unlicensed carts and lost, right? Right?
11·1 day agoSigh. From the dictionary:
- based on an inherent sense of right and wrong; natural justice. 2. a : being in accordance with or determined by nature; natural impulses.3. as is normal or to be expected; ordinary or logical.
It’s funny you claim a limited, special definition that’s more semantics than substance. Yet then still claim ambiguity is an issue. And state the problem is a subjective (limited, special) interpretation.
Sounds like a merry go round.
Fundamentalism? No. Not really. I was certainly tempted to just reply with something like you’re made in God’s image nonsense but I genuinely don’t believe that. I’m more a deist than any kind of theist.
Have you read The Moral Landscape by Sam Harris? I think that’s a good look into harm reduction.
11·1 day agoRead more studies.
If the scratches mismatches release the latches.
13·1 day agoThat’s some bullshit.
LMAO. The amount of replies giving advice…
2·1 day agoAs I recall Go players have adapted and have found ways to induce hallucinations and beat the machine, some using other AI. Others have adopted “adversarial strategies.”
https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.00241
They say it’s comprehensible enough that a human “expert” can do it without algorithmic assistance.
A black hat is a malicious(evil) hacker. The goal is unauthorized access of remote computer systems, typically. The closer to root the better.
A grey hat is a neutral hacker. Probably mostly a curiosity, no good or bad intent. Perhaps like someone who’s trying to reverse engineer a game console because they own a lot of games and they’re just curious how it all works. Or someone that just wants to make a backup of a movie (circumvent DRM.)
A white hat is a benevolent hacker that seeks to fix exploits that black hats use to perform their crimes. And they often target the greys(but usually the lawyers are more effective there.)
AI has achieved rank: script kiddy
Y’all got any interesting news?
Mine insists I’m a bot and requests I sign in.
Other times it works occasionally.
Like rolling dice.
I don’t have the energy for this cherry picking nonsense.
Are you capable of understanding paragraphs? Is your context window too narrow?
Sigh. A lie? Oh sigh. Not really a lie but you wouldn’t understand why. They say the angels fly because they take themselves so lightly. What more then the father of all angels?