fyi: “whom" is the correct word to use in two of the three instances.
here’s a tip: if the answer to the question is him, her, or them (as opposed to he, she, or they), then whom is to be used in the question.
there’s nothing pretentious about correctness. it’s about the nominative case vs the accusative case.
so jurassic park’s t-rex caused “moderate turbulence”?
“onik, onik!”
when they are used in those countries that use them the most, d’you think everyone bursts out singing, “happy bidet to you!”?
maga becomes increasingly racist and bbc instantly drops down the rankings. coincidence?
if the usa trotted down this path, their app would pay homage to the tansprayed president and be called MaxDonald. there would be an oversized version dubbed the Big Max. they would even target e-readers with the MaxBook Pro.
the idf will be fuming at this data. they would have expected that number to be closer to six out of six.
clue/do would be so much more fun on this board.
that’s what shed said.
if you were going the other way and made a u-turn at this point, would you be dublin back?
this person likes sorting their lemmy feed by “hot”, apparently.
it’s a fa-a-a-a-ke!
there’s no way a really neurodivergent person would be able to fit that elegant explanation in so small a tweet.
they’ll just rename it to see-ya-later sing sing.
ironically, the helm is the one piece of kit she isn’t wearing.
do check out the lords cricket ground (aka the home of cricket. no, seriously).
matches have been played there for over a hundred years with one end of the playing field being about 9ft higher than the other.
it was $100 after that piece of evidence passed through dozens of sticky official fingers.
the question is not “who is next?”, but it’s “who(m) are we going after next?”
the “who(m)” is not the subject of the sentence here. it’s the object. the subject is the “we”. so “whom” applies here.
if the question were indeed “who is next?” (as you have misread it), then your point would be valid. but your entire argument stems from an incorrect premise.